Is Oneal a boy or girl name?
Oneal is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 13 boys were named Oneal, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 4.1% of the 3,173 US babies named Oneal were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #6,701
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Oneal since 1889
- 3,173
- Most popular year
- 1932
- 72 babies
Boys and girls named Oneal, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 58 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 266 | 42 | 13.6% |
| 1920s | 499 | 49 | 8.9% |
| 1930s | 509 | 34 | 6.3% |
| 1940s | 430 | 5 | 1.1% |
| 1950s | 365 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 224 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 175 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 129 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 142 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 123 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 70 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 43 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13 | #6,701 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 5 | #13,610 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 8 | #9,601 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 5 | #13,551 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 12 | #6,919 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 9 | #8,690 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 6 | #11,816 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 9 | #8,630 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 9 | #8,533 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 11 | #7,408 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 8 | #9,423 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 6 | #11,869 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 12 | #6,895 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 7 | #10,669 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 17 | #5,423 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 8 | #9,520 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 7 | #10,358 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 9 | #8,121 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 14 | #5,715 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 12 | #6,153 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 15 | #5,076 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 12 | #5,924 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 22 | #3,722 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 7 | #8,472 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 16 | #4,355 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 11 | #5,555 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 20 | #3,516 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 15 | #4,214 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 13 | #4,728 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 19 | #3,464 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 18 | #3,569 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 10 | #5,399 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 13 | #4,343 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 10 | #5,076 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 13 | #3,841 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 20 | #2,690 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 14 | #3,388 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 9 | #4,590 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 11 | #3,866 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 14 | #3,189 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 13 | #3,437 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 14 | #3,172 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 11 | #3,780 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 12 | #3,505 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 19 | #2,450 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 17 | #2,628 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 28 | #1,814 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 24 | #1,983 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 21 | #2,095 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 12 | #2,976 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 17 | #2,306 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 10 | #3,294 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 15 | #2,475 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 17 | #2,104 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 26 | #1,562 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 23 | #1,637 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 22 | #1,677 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 18 | #1,898 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 18 | #1,957 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 27 | #1,535 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 21 | #1,793 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 20 | #1,860 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 32 | #1,424 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 39 | #1,258 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 39 | #1,246 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 38 | #1,276 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 30 | #1,435 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 36 | #1,266 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 35 | #1,289 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 34 | #1,299 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 26 | #1,509 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 39 | #1,166 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 49 | #1,001 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 43 | #1,081 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 37 | #1,189 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 37 | #1,205 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 38 | #1,142 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 43 | #984 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 58 | #827 | 5 | #5,070 |
| 1943 | 41 | #1,069 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 42 | #1,048 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 42 | #998 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 49 | #915 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 38 | #1,048 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 39 | #1,039 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 56 | #821 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 37 | #1,065 | 6 | #4,041 |
| 1935 | 63 | #784 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 52 | #876 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 50 | #883 | 5 | #4,703 |
| 1932 | 63 | #810 | 9 | #3,216 |
| 1931 | 57 | #839 | 8 | #3,418 |
| 1930 | 54 | #913 | 6 | #4,424 |
| 1929 | 56 | #897 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 44 | #1,053 | 5 | #5,251 |
| 1927 | 56 | #921 | 5 | #5,407 |
| 1926 | 53 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 50 | #970 | 10 | #3,303 |
| 1924 | 45 | #1,065 | 8 | #3,915 |
| 1923 | 52 | #960 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 53 | #969 | 9 | #3,596 |
| 1921 | 44 | #1,067 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 46 | #1,029 | 12 | #2,852 |
| 1919 | 39 | #1,115 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 49 | #961 | 6 | #4,689 |
| 1917 | 35 | #1,148 | 12 | #2,667 |
| 1916 | 36 | #1,091 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 23 | #1,444 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 30 | #1,043 | 6 | #3,505 |
| 1913 | 14 | #1,486 | 7 | #2,743 |
| 1912 | 17 | #1,165 | 6 | #2,885 |
| 1911 | 12 | #1,028 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 11 | #1,027 | 5 | #2,690 |
| 1909 | 10 | #1,006 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 6 | #1,329 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 6 | #1,297 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 6 | #1,209 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,170 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 8 | #893 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 8 | #909 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 8 | #1,026 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 5 | #1,144 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 5 | #1,074 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Oneal reached #784 in 1935. As a girl name, it reached #2,667 in 1917. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1930s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.