Is Jovita a boy or girl name?
Jovita was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 3,289 US babies named Jovita were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #11,548
- Babies named Jovita since 1903
- 3,289
- Most popular year
- 1930
- 62 babies
Boys and girls named Jovita, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 45 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 150 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 442 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 424 | 100% |
| 1940s | 5 | 324 | 98.5% |
| 1950s | 0 | 438 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 305 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 373 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 344 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 220 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 128 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 62 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 29 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,548 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,674 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,590 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,220 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,081 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,191 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,664 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,449 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,420 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,369 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,788 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,921 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 7 | #14,535 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 13 | #9,257 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,891 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,328 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,596 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,733 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,031 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,462 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,805 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,039 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,190 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,730 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,193 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,448 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,833 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,311 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,762 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,077 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,468 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,173 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,522 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,874 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,490 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,889 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,243 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,409 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,507 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,240 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,555 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,319 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,250 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,041 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,569 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,035 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,363 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,243 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,334 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,309 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,217 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,472 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,384 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,818 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,324 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,085 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,086 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,076 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,284 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,756 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,963 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,899 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,422 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,559 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,671 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,454 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,387 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,353 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,479 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,678 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,812 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,478 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,373 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,494 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,943 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,464 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,721 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,133 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,783 |
| 1941 | 5 | #3,771 | 45 | #1,109 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,388 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,169 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,193 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,170 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,124 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 50 | #978 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,114 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,113 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,184 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,154 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 62 | #932 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 57 | #953 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,001 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,014 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,038 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,429 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,067 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,237 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,520 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,643 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,295 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,464 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,725 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,958 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,078 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,650 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,065 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,673 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,054 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,073 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,850 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,535 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,614 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,454 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,836 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,423 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,932 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jovita reached #3,771 in 1941. As a girl name, it reached #932 in 1930. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1930s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Jovita
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.