Is Wynona a boy or girl name?
Wynona is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 67 girls and 0 boys were named Wynona, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,774 US babies named Wynona were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,626
- Babies named Wynona since 1899
- 3,774
- Most popular year
- 1930
- 97 babies
Boys and girls named Wynona, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 72 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 362 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 751 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 756 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 487 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 393 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 242 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 166 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 47 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 105 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 57 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 91 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 239 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,626 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,755 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,164 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,211 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,749 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,696 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,229 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,894 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,076 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,456 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 8 | #13,009 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 6 | #16,740 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 8 | #13,387 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 6 | #17,393 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 10 | #11,584 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,928 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,728 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,152 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,990 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,143 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,318 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,393 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 6 | #13,675 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,801 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,749 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 7 | #11,754 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 13 | #7,034 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,047 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,971 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,481 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,827 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 5 | #13,841 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,801 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,509 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,467 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,035 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,079 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,940 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,433 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,939 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,207 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,137 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,210 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,154 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,522 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,541 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,577 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,460 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,786 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,778 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,517 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,934 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,529 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,487 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,887 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,674 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,884 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,764 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,072 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,903 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,737 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,639 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,435 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,620 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,712 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,503 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,323 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,488 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,407 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,460 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,275 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,212 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,128 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,069 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,064 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 56 | #985 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 54 | #977 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 66 | #867 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 76 | #810 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 64 | #869 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 66 | #839 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 88 | #720 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 70 | #810 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 65 | #833 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 75 | #789 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 89 | #716 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 97 | #705 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 59 | #940 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 87 | #772 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 93 | #746 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 65 | #930 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 71 | #884 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 79 | #848 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 82 | #810 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 84 | #797 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 68 | #904 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 63 | #920 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 53 | #998 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 53 | #997 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,012 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,085 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,138 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 50 | #842 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 33 | #944 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,251 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,169 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,768 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,287 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,083 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,817 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,722 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,537 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,788 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,218 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,465 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,593 |
Highest rank
Wynona has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #705 in 1930. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1930s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Wynona
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.