Is Loyce a boy or girl name?
Loyce was mostly a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 81.9% of the 4,278 US babies named Loyce were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Loyce since 1901
- 4,278
- Most popular year
- 1933
- 130 babies
Boys and girls named Loyce, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | 92 | 94.8% |
| 1910s | 142 | 434 | 75.3% |
| 1920s | 204 | 798 | 79.6% |
| 1930s | 164 | 822 | 83.4% |
| 1940s | 117 | 680 | 85.3% |
| 1950s | 82 | 446 | 84.5% |
| 1960s | 40 | 184 | 82.1% |
| 1970s | 21 | 34 | 61.8% |
| 1980s | 0 | 13 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,650 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,794 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,189 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 6 | #5,567 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,927 |
| 1974 | 5 | #5,690 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 5 | #5,457 | 6 | #7,811 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,339 |
| 1970 | 5 | #5,159 | 8 | #6,113 |
| 1969 | 7 | #3,807 | 13 | #4,083 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,126 |
| 1967 | 5 | #4,328 | 13 | #3,767 |
| 1966 | 5 | #4,308 | 19 | #2,900 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,488 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,240 |
| 1963 | 8 | #3,224 | 13 | #3,727 |
| 1962 | 9 | #2,971 | 23 | #2,575 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,021 |
| 1960 | 6 | #3,904 | 32 | #2,041 |
| 1959 | 5 | #4,346 | 34 | #1,938 |
| 1958 | 6 | #3,774 | 53 | #1,476 |
| 1957 | 5 | #4,326 | 33 | #1,914 |
| 1956 | 10 | #2,724 | 35 | #1,819 |
| 1955 | 9 | #2,890 | 38 | #1,682 |
| 1954 | 8 | #3,089 | 37 | #1,692 |
| 1953 | 6 | #3,647 | 54 | #1,326 |
| 1952 | 9 | #2,803 | 37 | #1,597 |
| 1951 | 16 | #1,947 | 64 | #1,174 |
| 1950 | 8 | #2,933 | 61 | #1,189 |
| 1949 | 8 | #2,928 | 64 | #1,139 |
| 1948 | 15 | #1,993 | 69 | #1,064 |
| 1947 | 9 | #2,787 | 74 | #1,035 |
| 1946 | 11 | #2,353 | 64 | #1,064 |
| 1945 | 7 | #2,901 | 65 | #963 |
| 1944 | 12 | #2,146 | 71 | #913 |
| 1943 | 15 | #1,960 | 59 | #1,043 |
| 1942 | 14 | #2,012 | 82 | #850 |
| 1941 | 12 | #2,162 | 62 | #938 |
| 1940 | 14 | #1,949 | 70 | #855 |
| 1939 | 17 | #1,689 | 77 | #781 |
| 1938 | 15 | #1,869 | 92 | #715 |
| 1937 | 12 | #2,154 | 61 | #888 |
| 1936 | 16 | #1,765 | 75 | #783 |
| 1935 | 7 | #3,143 | 77 | #770 |
| 1934 | 16 | #1,826 | 78 | #760 |
| 1933 | 23 | #1,437 | 107 | #633 |
| 1932 | 12 | #2,269 | 98 | #686 |
| 1931 | 25 | #1,414 | 77 | #764 |
| 1930 | 21 | #1,633 | 80 | #790 |
| 1929 | 10 | #2,697 | 65 | #890 |
| 1928 | 21 | #1,679 | 91 | #747 |
| 1927 | 21 | #1,727 | 73 | #867 |
| 1926 | 18 | #1,877 | 80 | #820 |
| 1925 | 19 | #1,845 | 90 | #782 |
| 1924 | 29 | #1,399 | 77 | #856 |
| 1923 | 22 | #1,678 | 74 | #854 |
| 1922 | 17 | #2,001 | 91 | #767 |
| 1921 | 22 | #1,686 | 83 | #807 |
| 1920 | 25 | #1,532 | 74 | #843 |
| 1919 | 22 | #1,607 | 77 | #803 |
| 1918 | 21 | #1,685 | 66 | #883 |
| 1917 | 12 | #2,370 | 51 | #984 |
| 1916 | 17 | #1,818 | 63 | #861 |
| 1915 | 23 | #1,439 | 60 | #843 |
| 1914 | 15 | #1,658 | 28 | #1,166 |
| 1913 | 12 | #1,636 | 26 | #1,080 |
| 1912 | 9 | #1,831 | 31 | #913 |
| 1911 | 11 | #1,093 | 16 | #1,148 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,149 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 19 | #954 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,315 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,020 |
| 1906 | 5 | #1,356 | 7 | #1,654 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,630 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,434 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 16 | #887 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,189 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Loyce reached #1,093 in 1911. As a girl name, it reached #633 in 1933. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1930s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.