Is Ozell a boy or girl name?
Ozell was used for both, more often for boys in the US. Across 1880–2024, 39.4% of the 2,836 US babies named Ozell were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Ozell since 1902
- 2,836
- Most popular year
- 1920
- 83 babies
Boys and girls named Ozell, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 7 | 65 | 90.3% |
| 1910s | 143 | 277 | 66% |
| 1920s | 259 | 390 | 60.1% |
| 1930s | 310 | 217 | 41.2% |
| 1940s | 257 | 104 | 28.8% |
| 1950s | 249 | 53 | 17.5% |
| 1960s | 182 | 10 | 5.2% |
| 1970s | 119 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 80 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 58 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 26 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 24 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 6 | #11,633 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 5 | #13,594 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 5 | #13,672 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 5 | #13,550 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 9 | #8,590 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 6 | #11,677 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 6 | #11,108 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 8 | #8,420 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 6 | #10,320 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 7 | #8,217 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 6 | #8,718 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 6 | #8,590 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 6 | #8,522 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 12 | #4,924 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 6 | #8,185 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 5 | #9,227 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 10 | #5,273 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 7 | #6,738 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 10 | #4,690 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 5 | #7,819 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 6 | #6,508 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 9 | #4,594 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 13 | #3,399 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 10 | #4,156 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 11 | #3,790 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 9 | #4,403 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 8 | #4,728 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 9 | #4,070 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 11 | #3,534 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 10 | #3,646 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 13 | #3,035 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 7 | #4,503 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 18 | #2,294 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 12 | #2,951 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 14 | #2,654 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 17 | #2,267 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 18 | #2,030 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 14 | #2,279 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 12 | #2,438 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 18 | #1,868 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 22 | #1,705 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 12 | #2,515 | 5 | #7,503 |
| 1963 | 22 | #1,730 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 22 | #1,744 | 5 | #7,290 |
| 1961 | 17 | #2,051 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 25 | #1,653 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 22 | #1,749 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 17 | #2,001 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 19 | #1,878 | 6 | #5,898 |
| 1956 | 26 | #1,561 | 8 | #4,725 |
| 1955 | 29 | #1,444 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 28 | #1,460 | 11 | #3,653 |
| 1953 | 24 | #1,577 | 9 | #4,157 |
| 1952 | 30 | #1,394 | 6 | #5,394 |
| 1951 | 27 | #1,446 | 7 | #4,709 |
| 1950 | 27 | #1,417 | 6 | #5,140 |
| 1949 | 24 | #1,534 | 16 | #2,597 |
| 1948 | 31 | #1,315 | 5 | #5,819 |
| 1947 | 26 | #1,471 | 8 | #4,250 |
| 1946 | 20 | #1,633 | 7 | #4,308 |
| 1945 | 21 | #1,485 | 10 | #3,074 |
| 1944 | 41 | #1,032 | 6 | #4,435 |
| 1943 | 24 | #1,452 | 12 | #2,815 |
| 1942 | 25 | #1,410 | 9 | #3,372 |
| 1941 | 21 | #1,516 | 16 | #2,168 |
| 1940 | 24 | #1,392 | 15 | #2,186 |
| 1939 | 25 | #1,352 | 19 | #1,859 |
| 1938 | 29 | #1,241 | 23 | #1,631 |
| 1937 | 42 | #977 | 11 | #2,696 |
| 1936 | 32 | #1,177 | 14 | #2,239 |
| 1935 | 36 | #1,094 | 22 | #1,649 |
| 1934 | 41 | #1,019 | 21 | #1,687 |
| 1933 | 25 | #1,353 | 20 | #1,761 |
| 1932 | 26 | #1,375 | 20 | #1,803 |
| 1931 | 32 | #1,236 | 30 | #1,368 |
| 1930 | 22 | #1,592 | 37 | #1,247 |
| 1929 | 24 | #1,511 | 25 | #1,589 |
| 1928 | 29 | #1,376 | 26 | #1,630 |
| 1927 | 25 | #1,549 | 36 | #1,353 |
| 1926 | 36 | #1,212 | 43 | #1,176 |
| 1925 | 21 | #1,727 | 35 | #1,367 |
| 1924 | 25 | #1,564 | 46 | #1,166 |
| 1923 | 28 | #1,411 | 45 | #1,156 |
| 1922 | 24 | #1,574 | 42 | #1,205 |
| 1921 | 18 | #1,967 | 38 | #1,274 |
| 1920 | 29 | #1,373 | 54 | #1,012 |
| 1919 | 22 | #1,613 | 32 | #1,387 |
| 1918 | 22 | #1,639 | 40 | #1,201 |
| 1917 | 16 | #1,963 | 37 | #1,202 |
| 1916 | 18 | #1,750 | 44 | #1,053 |
| 1915 | 17 | #1,758 | 31 | #1,282 |
| 1914 | 19 | #1,429 | 20 | #1,475 |
| 1913 | 8 | #2,223 | 17 | #1,454 |
| 1912 | 10 | #1,711 | 21 | #1,170 |
| 1911 | 5 | #1,938 | 15 | #1,222 |
| 1910 | 6 | #1,542 | 20 | #992 |
| 1909 | 7 | #1,242 | 12 | #1,267 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,812 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,004 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,296 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,872 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,453 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,411 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,412 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Ozell reached #977 in 1937. As a girl name, it reached #992 in 1910. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Ozell
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.