Is Randolph a boy or girl name?
Randolph is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 17 boys were named Randolph, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 49,514 US babies named Randolph were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,588
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Randolph since 1880
- 49,514
- Most popular year
- 1952
- 1,817 babies
Boys and girls named Randolph, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 193 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 267 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 414 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 1,857 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 2,735 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 2,854 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 7,555 | 15 | 0.2% |
| 1950s | 15,496 | 44 | 0.3% |
| 1960s | 8,193 | 30 | 0.4% |
| 1970s | 4,021 | 18 | 0.4% |
| 1980s | 2,899 | 5 | 0.2% |
| 1990s | 1,572 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 799 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 434 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 113 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17 | #5,588 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 30 | #3,773 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 20 | #4,977 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 18 | #5,284 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 28 | #3,783 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 26 | #4,081 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 39 | #3,039 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 42 | #2,878 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 36 | #3,211 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 45 | #2,708 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 51 | #2,483 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 41 | #2,831 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 46 | #2,667 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 59 | #2,223 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 49 | #2,541 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 56 | #2,343 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 57 | #2,318 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 70 | #2,015 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 76 | #1,819 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 74 | #1,785 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 66 | #1,873 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 80 | #1,588 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 104 | #1,301 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 107 | #1,252 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 109 | #1,234 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 98 | #1,265 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 108 | #1,167 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 122 | #1,048 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 127 | #989 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 162 | #850 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 143 | #915 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 185 | #774 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 177 | #791 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 223 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 227 | #672 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 245 | #640 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 245 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 247 | #580 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 258 | #554 | 5 | #12,299 |
| 1985 | 326 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 279 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 332 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 314 | #482 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 345 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 308 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 350 | #428 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 345 | #426 | 5 | #10,984 |
| 1977 | 387 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 382 | #396 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 355 | #409 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 382 | #397 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 403 | #385 | 8 | #6,506 |
| 1972 | 413 | #387 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 435 | #385 | 5 | #9,259 |
| 1970 | 569 | #334 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 590 | #315 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 603 | #304 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 614 | #296 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 747 | #269 | 5 | #7,346 |
| 1965 | 779 | #266 | 8 | #5,179 |
| 1964 | 817 | #270 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 910 | #252 | 6 | #6,419 |
| 1962 | 985 | #249 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 1,069 | #241 | 5 | #7,301 |
| 1960 | 1,079 | #244 | 6 | #6,224 |
| 1959 | 1,072 | #246 | 7 | #5,444 |
| 1958 | 1,184 | #222 | 5 | #6,797 |
| 1957 | 1,358 | #199 | 5 | #6,813 |
| 1956 | 1,634 | #179 | 6 | #5,802 |
| 1955 | 1,765 | #162 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 1,764 | #163 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 1,715 | #161 | 10 | #3,900 |
| 1952 | 1,817 | #154 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 1,636 | #160 | 5 | #6,040 |
| 1950 | 1,551 | #162 | 6 | #5,161 |
| 1949 | 1,361 | #170 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 1,143 | #182 | 5 | #5,850 |
| 1947 | 963 | #205 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 836 | #205 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 645 | #214 | 5 | #5,100 |
| 1944 | 607 | #227 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 665 | #220 | 5 | #5,218 |
| 1942 | 535 | #247 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 418 | #281 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 382 | #287 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 393 | #281 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 328 | #302 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 300 | #308 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 275 | #328 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 312 | #307 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 259 | #341 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 228 | #360 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 256 | #347 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 232 | #370 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 271 | #339 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 212 | #399 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 293 | #331 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 275 | #352 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 281 | #343 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 267 | #365 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 265 | #370 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 295 | #341 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 284 | #351 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 270 | #370 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 293 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 242 | #372 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 247 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 265 | #338 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 263 | #328 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 220 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 192 | #334 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 148 | #338 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 141 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 74 | #318 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 65 | #308 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 60 | #295 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 52 | #306 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 40 | #347 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 45 | #308 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 40 | #318 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 34 | #348 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 35 | #321 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 34 | #335 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 24 | #392 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 50 | #295 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 23 | #390 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 33 | #337 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 29 | #351 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 24 | #405 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 29 | #345 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 24 | #385 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 26 | #356 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 36 | #311 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 22 | #369 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 21 | #403 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 27 | #346 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 23 | #396 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 15 | #453 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 22 | #379 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 21 | #395 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 17 | #466 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 16 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 15 | #485 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 18 | #409 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 19 | #398 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Randolph reached #154 in 1952. As a girl name, it reached #3,900 in 1953. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Randolph
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.