Is Randel a boy or girl name?
Randel was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0.7% of the 3,676 US babies named Randel were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Randel since 1914
- 3,676
- Most popular year
- 1957
- 128 babies
Boys and girls named Randel, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 24 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 88 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 132 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 389 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,104 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 813 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 401 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 320 | 20 | 5.9% |
| 1990s | 214 | 5 | 2.3% |
| 2000s | 105 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 50 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 11 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 5 | #13,696 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 6 | #11,981 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 8 | #9,474 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 5 | #13,791 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 5 | #13,730 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 5 | #13,613 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 11 | #7,428 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 5 | #13,864 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 11 | #7,466 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 11 | #7,584 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 6 | #12,221 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 11 | #7,467 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 12 | #6,806 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 11 | #7,002 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 6 | #11,025 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 12 | #6,173 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 13 | #5,648 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 11 | #6,345 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 12 | #5,829 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 15 | #4,710 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 18 | #3,972 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 21 | #3,429 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 11 | #5,453 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 20 | #3,408 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 19 | #3,566 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 24 | #2,925 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 23 | #2,979 | 5 | #14,944 |
| 1991 | 30 | #2,385 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 33 | #2,201 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 38 | #1,946 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 34 | #1,940 | 6 | #11,382 |
| 1987 | 33 | #1,929 | 7 | #9,535 |
| 1986 | 32 | #1,907 | 7 | #9,298 |
| 1985 | 45 | #1,499 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 24 | #2,220 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 37 | #1,624 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 20 | #2,500 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 23 | #2,254 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 34 | #1,719 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 37 | #1,589 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 24 | #2,055 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 34 | #1,632 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 34 | #1,596 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 38 | #1,446 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 38 | #1,404 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 36 | #1,425 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 52 | #1,134 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 48 | #1,195 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 60 | #1,059 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 57 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 42 | #1,180 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 62 | #923 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 76 | #839 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 75 | #852 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 68 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 83 | #835 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 112 | #726 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 116 | #714 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 122 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 110 | #734 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 128 | #672 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 128 | #675 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 113 | #698 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 111 | #699 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 111 | #687 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 116 | #660 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 97 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 106 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 84 | #753 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 68 | #829 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 60 | #885 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 57 | #933 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 44 | #1,041 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 28 | #1,262 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 30 | #1,231 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 18 | #1,750 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 27 | #1,354 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 29 | #1,248 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 28 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 21 | #1,481 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 16 | #1,800 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 17 | #1,738 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 18 | #1,630 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 13 | #2,107 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 9 | #2,706 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 13 | #2,075 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 6 | #3,690 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 10 | #2,607 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 9 | #2,963 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 8 | #3,189 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 6 | #4,049 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 18 | #1,938 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 13 | #2,400 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 8 | #3,336 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 7 | #3,780 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 8 | #3,400 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 6 | #4,213 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 5 | #4,834 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 9 | #3,159 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,665 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 5 | #4,449 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 8 | #3,011 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 6 | #3,184 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Randel reached #660 in 1953. As a girl name, it reached #9,298 in 1986. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Randel
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.