Is Roberto a boy or girl name?
Roberto is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 538 boys were named Roberto, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.7% of the 112,951 US babies named Roberto were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #553
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Roberto since 1897
- 112,951
- Most popular year
- 1991
- 2,133 babies
Boys and girls named Roberto, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 66 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 534 | 6 | 1.1% |
| 1920s | 2,421 | 49 | 2% |
| 1930s | 2,897 | 63 | 2.1% |
| 1940s | 4,453 | 64 | 1.4% |
| 1950s | 7,550 | 87 | 1.1% |
| 1960s | 10,868 | 118 | 1.1% |
| 1970s | 15,157 | 144 | 0.9% |
| 1980s | 17,820 | 151 | 0.8% |
| 1990s | 20,063 | 118 | 0.6% |
| 2000s | 18,005 | 34 | 0.2% |
| 2010s | 9,309 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 2,968 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 538 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 560 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 612 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 581 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 677 | #437 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 634 | #469 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 681 | #444 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 779 | #406 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 893 | #372 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 926 | #358 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 965 | #343 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 954 | #339 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 1,074 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 1,131 | #295 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 1,272 | #273 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 1,417 | #248 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 1,580 | #233 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 1,748 | #219 | 9 | #12,454 |
| 2006 | 1,729 | #216 | 5 | #19,427 |
| 2005 | 1,877 | #204 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 1,875 | #202 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 1,873 | #200 | 7 | #13,521 |
| 2002 | 1,995 | #188 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 1,955 | #190 | 7 | #13,183 |
| 2000 | 1,956 | #187 | 6 | #14,635 |
| 1999 | 1,960 | #177 | 8 | #11,149 |
| 1998 | 1,960 | #172 | 7 | #12,113 |
| 1997 | 1,944 | #175 | 8 | #10,586 |
| 1996 | 1,919 | #175 | 8 | #10,318 |
| 1995 | 2,004 | #165 | 11 | #7,949 |
| 1994 | 1,969 | #162 | 11 | #8,019 |
| 1993 | 2,081 | #155 | 19 | #5,148 |
| 1992 | 2,012 | #158 | 13 | #6,949 |
| 1991 | 2,118 | #153 | 15 | #6,180 |
| 1990 | 2,096 | #150 | 18 | #5,233 |
| 1989 | 2,017 | #149 | 15 | #5,779 |
| 1988 | 1,661 | #168 | 24 | #3,869 |
| 1987 | 1,627 | #167 | 18 | #4,619 |
| 1986 | 1,709 | #157 | 18 | #4,501 |
| 1985 | 1,705 | #160 | 11 | #6,348 |
| 1984 | 1,673 | #162 | 11 | #6,179 |
| 1983 | 1,774 | #152 | 11 | #6,125 |
| 1982 | 1,846 | #150 | 8 | #8,034 |
| 1981 | 1,927 | #147 | 14 | #5,178 |
| 1980 | 1,881 | #145 | 21 | #3,814 |
| 1979 | 1,660 | #155 | 15 | #4,796 |
| 1978 | 1,611 | #154 | 18 | #4,035 |
| 1977 | 1,630 | #151 | 22 | #3,461 |
| 1976 | 1,587 | #156 | 12 | #5,117 |
| 1975 | 1,557 | #155 | 14 | #4,535 |
| 1974 | 1,513 | #160 | 16 | #3,993 |
| 1973 | 1,439 | #166 | 11 | #5,124 |
| 1972 | 1,405 | #176 | 14 | #4,252 |
| 1971 | 1,392 | #183 | 8 | #6,459 |
| 1970 | 1,363 | #196 | 14 | #4,198 |
| 1969 | 1,329 | #196 | 10 | #4,973 |
| 1968 | 1,212 | #195 | 16 | #3,420 |
| 1967 | 1,144 | #202 | 10 | #4,552 |
| 1966 | 1,104 | #210 | 12 | #3,902 |
| 1965 | 1,062 | #224 | 17 | #3,129 |
| 1964 | 1,057 | #230 | 14 | #3,655 |
| 1963 | 1,047 | #232 | 6 | #6,441 |
| 1962 | 1,018 | #244 | 15 | #3,405 |
| 1961 | 948 | #255 | 7 | #5,723 |
| 1960 | 947 | #258 | 11 | #4,114 |
| 1959 | 896 | #267 | 14 | #3,390 |
| 1958 | 931 | #255 | 12 | #3,701 |
| 1957 | 817 | #263 | 8 | #4,828 |
| 1956 | 749 | #265 | 11 | #3,857 |
| 1955 | 745 | #252 | 8 | #4,657 |
| 1954 | 760 | #254 | 7 | #5,044 |
| 1953 | 710 | #262 | 9 | #4,171 |
| 1952 | 691 | #261 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 654 | #262 | 9 | #3,943 |
| 1950 | 597 | #270 | 9 | #3,903 |
| 1949 | 584 | #283 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 601 | #270 | 6 | #5,139 |
| 1947 | 524 | #300 | 8 | #4,270 |
| 1946 | 497 | #290 | 7 | #4,333 |
| 1945 | 438 | #286 | 7 | #3,946 |
| 1944 | 414 | #293 | 6 | #4,465 |
| 1943 | 390 | #315 | 6 | #4,597 |
| 1942 | 352 | #322 | 6 | #4,537 |
| 1941 | 344 | #315 | 9 | #3,201 |
| 1940 | 309 | #322 | 9 | #3,169 |
| 1939 | 285 | #327 | 5 | #4,815 |
| 1938 | 290 | #326 | 8 | #3,411 |
| 1937 | 292 | #316 | 10 | #2,894 |
| 1936 | 263 | #339 | 10 | #2,823 |
| 1935 | 265 | #337 | 7 | #3,686 |
| 1934 | 281 | #324 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 244 | #346 | 11 | #2,657 |
| 1932 | 267 | #337 | 5 | #4,973 |
| 1931 | 313 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 397 | #285 | 7 | #3,981 |
| 1929 | 354 | #297 | 10 | #3,101 |
| 1928 | 312 | #318 | 6 | #4,625 |
| 1927 | 305 | #327 | 7 | #4,205 |
| 1926 | 250 | #369 | 7 | #4,234 |
| 1925 | 249 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 241 | #387 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 233 | #389 | 5 | #5,579 |
| 1922 | 172 | #469 | 7 | #4,363 |
| 1921 | 157 | #496 | 7 | #4,376 |
| 1920 | 148 | #496 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 89 | #654 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 95 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 79 | #678 | 6 | #4,495 |
| 1916 | 63 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 59 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 43 | #813 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 31 | #893 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 41 | #666 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 15 | #888 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 19 | #701 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 11 | #943 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 16 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 11 | #854 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 7 | #1,097 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 8 | #948 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 8 | #898 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 5 | #1,184 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 6 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Roberto reached #145 in 1980. As a girl name, it reached #2,657 in 1933. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Roberto
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.