Is Romie a boy or girl name?
Romie is mostly a girl name in the US. In 2024, 45 girls and 5 boys were named Romie, so 90% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 26.4% of the 2,351 US babies named Romie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #13,794
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,484
- Babies named Romie since 1889
- 2,351
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 56 babies
Boys and girls named Romie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 41 | 5 | 10.9% |
| 1900s | 76 | 10 | 11.6% |
| 1910s | 241 | 62 | 20.5% |
| 1920s | 321 | 64 | 16.6% |
| 1930s | 239 | 30 | 11.2% |
| 1940s | 225 | 34 | 13.1% |
| 1950s | 159 | 19 | 10.7% |
| 1960s | 118 | 10 | 7.8% |
| 1970s | 89 | 7 | 7.3% |
| 1980s | 58 | 14 | 19.4% |
| 1990s | 46 | 23 | 33.3% |
| 2000s | 45 | 78 | 63.4% |
| 2010s | 41 | 112 | 73.2% |
| 2020s | 26 | 153 | 85.5% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | #13,794 | 45 | #3,484 |
| 2023 | 6 | #11,956 | 31 | #4,537 |
| 2022 | 10 | #8,180 | 29 | #4,768 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,065 |
| 2020 | 5 | #13,651 | 22 | #5,622 |
| 2019 | 7 | #10,579 | 10 | #10,323 |
| 2018 | 5 | #13,699 | 12 | #9,046 |
| 2017 | 9 | #8,688 | 9 | #11,441 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,969 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 6 | #16,042 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,404 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,787 |
| 2012 | 5 | #13,812 | 16 | #7,724 |
| 2011 | 6 | #11,967 | 10 | #11,021 |
| 2010 | 9 | #8,652 | 15 | #8,213 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 13 | #9,295 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 8 | #13,566 |
| 2007 | 6 | #12,067 | 6 | #17,172 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,153 |
| 2005 | 7 | #9,922 | 6 | #16,030 |
| 2004 | 8 | #8,760 | 14 | #8,139 |
| 2003 | 8 | #8,466 | 6 | #15,353 |
| 2002 | 6 | #10,403 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 10 | #6,837 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,728 |
| 1999 | 8 | #7,732 | 7 | #12,380 |
| 1998 | 7 | #8,279 | 10 | #9,130 |
| 1997 | 8 | #7,143 | 6 | #13,366 |
| 1996 | 6 | #8,798 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 10 | #5,693 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 7 | #7,129 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 8 | #6,105 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 8 | #5,638 | 6 | #11,411 |
| 1987 | 8 | #5,351 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 5 | #7,372 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 6 | #6,069 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 9 | #4,513 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 7 | #5,377 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 7 | #5,396 | 8 | #7,967 |
| 1979 | 12 | #3,522 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 7 | #4,944 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 7 | #5,014 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 9 | #3,941 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 8 | #4,229 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 15 | #2,649 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 6 | #4,964 | 7 | #7,248 |
| 1972 | 7 | #4,351 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 10 | #3,315 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 8 | #3,768 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 10 | #3,028 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 17 | #2,017 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 10 | #2,736 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 11 | #2,598 | 5 | #7,379 |
| 1965 | 6 | #3,856 | 5 | #7,297 |
| 1964 | 17 | #2,026 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 17 | #2,032 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 14 | #2,259 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 16 | #2,105 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 16 | #2,094 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 18 | #1,947 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 17 | #2,004 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 18 | #1,933 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 17 | #1,963 | 6 | #5,703 |
| 1954 | 18 | #1,878 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 13 | #2,265 | 5 | #6,357 |
| 1952 | 16 | #1,994 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 13 | #2,231 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 13 | #2,184 | 8 | #4,245 |
| 1949 | 22 | #1,606 | 5 | #5,898 |
| 1948 | 27 | #1,425 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 24 | #1,548 | 5 | #5,960 |
| 1946 | 19 | #1,683 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 13 | #1,996 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 17 | #1,725 | 5 | #5,119 |
| 1943 | 28 | #1,336 | 5 | #5,246 |
| 1942 | 22 | #1,524 | 7 | #4,050 |
| 1941 | 29 | #1,251 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 24 | #1,393 | 7 | #3,794 |
| 1939 | 23 | #1,420 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 19 | #1,606 | 8 | #3,412 |
| 1937 | 34 | #1,143 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 27 | #1,291 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 24 | #1,418 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 27 | #1,315 | 6 | #4,211 |
| 1933 | 28 | #1,276 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 20 | #1,639 | 10 | #3,014 |
| 1931 | 21 | #1,583 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 16 | #1,946 | 6 | #4,464 |
| 1929 | 24 | #1,516 | 5 | #5,163 |
| 1928 | 30 | #1,348 | 8 | #3,696 |
| 1927 | 23 | #1,635 | 5 | #5,483 |
| 1926 | 25 | #1,505 | 9 | #3,505 |
| 1925 | 32 | #1,297 | 8 | #3,967 |
| 1924 | 34 | #1,262 | 9 | #3,618 |
| 1923 | 32 | #1,294 | 8 | #3,906 |
| 1922 | 43 | #1,083 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 34 | #1,264 | 5 | #5,724 |
| 1920 | 44 | #1,069 | 7 | #4,322 |
| 1919 | 30 | #1,315 | 12 | #2,777 |
| 1918 | 42 | #1,057 | 14 | #2,489 |
| 1917 | 32 | #1,219 | 8 | #3,652 |
| 1916 | 32 | #1,173 | 5 | #5,023 |
| 1915 | 25 | #1,366 | 8 | #3,377 |
| 1914 | 31 | #1,014 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 19 | #1,199 | 9 | #2,303 |
| 1912 | 15 | #1,255 | 6 | #2,906 |
| 1911 | 5 | #1,951 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 10 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 10 | #1,012 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 10 | #937 | 5 | #2,373 |
| 1907 | 6 | #1,316 | 5 | #2,337 |
| 1906 | 8 | #984 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 9 | #908 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 13 | #677 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 6 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 5 | #1,284 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 9 | #772 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 8 | #845 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 7 | #976 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 5 | #1,237 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,671 |
| 1893 | 10 | #696 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 5 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 6 | #942 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 5 | #1,088 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Romie reached #677 in 1904. As a girl name, it reached #1,671 in 1894. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Romie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.