Is Susannah a boy or girl name?
Susannah is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 63 girls and 0 boys were named Susannah, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 7,715 US babies named Susannah were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,734
- Babies named Susannah since 1882
- 7,715
- Most popular year
- 1975
- 152 babies
Boys and girls named Susannah, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 34 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 31 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 33 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 74 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 99 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 137 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 253 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 320 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 758 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,422 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 1,227 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,242 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 953 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 831 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 301 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,734 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,517 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 53 | #3,119 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,815 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 79 | #2,276 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,648 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,777 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,299 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 94 | #2,091 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,313 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 93 | #2,093 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 97 | #2,018 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,903 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 78 | #2,391 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,536 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 77 | #2,483 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 88 | #2,250 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 94 | #2,145 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 95 | #2,080 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 91 | #2,070 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,903 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,895 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,730 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,939 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,550 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 93 | #1,737 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,707 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 127 | #1,360 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 140 | #1,254 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 138 | #1,244 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 129 | #1,321 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,388 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 123 | #1,356 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 143 | #1,214 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 137 | #1,228 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 121 | #1,309 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 132 | #1,163 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 121 | #1,199 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,291 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 122 | #1,171 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,143 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 119 | #1,130 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 132 | #1,083 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 139 | #1,037 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,168 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 143 | #1,005 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 150 | #946 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 135 | #1,003 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 149 | #888 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 152 | #878 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 131 | #948 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 149 | #868 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 142 | #891 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 137 | #942 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 134 | #951 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 132 | #927 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 111 | #998 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 113 | #965 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,159 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,387 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,442 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,448 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,509 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,785 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,010 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,760 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,700 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,022 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,146 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,872 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,830 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,528 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,012 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,013 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,047 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,658 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,643 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,191 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,436 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,741 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,281 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,521 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,109 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,688 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,095 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,510 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,102 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,730 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,504 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,713 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,414 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,705 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,536 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,734 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,673 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,006 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,936 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,029 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,023 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,681 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,798 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,447 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,967 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,401 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,073 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,424 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,211 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,535 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,224 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,108 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,842 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,143 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,371 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,190 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,183 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,198 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,139 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,765 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,903 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,570 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,371 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,286 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,682 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,516 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,025 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,261 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 7 | #914 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 8 | #846 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 7 | #804 |
Highest rank
Susannah has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #804 in 1882. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Susannah
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.