Is Trevor a boy or girl name?
Trevor is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 451 boys were named Trevor, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.4% of the 161,369 US babies named Trevor were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #625
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Trevor since 1915
- 161,369
- Most popular year
- 1998
- 6,616 babies
Boys and girls named Trevor, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 60 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 116 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 133 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 247 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 455 | 5 | 1.1% |
| 1960s | 3,738 | 59 | 1.6% |
| 1970s | 12,350 | 123 | 1% |
| 1980s | 26,696 | 166 | 0.6% |
| 1990s | 59,940 | 169 | 0.3% |
| 2000s | 40,054 | 84 | 0.2% |
| 2010s | 14,047 | 5 | 0% |
| 2020s | 2,922 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 451 | #625 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 530 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 555 | #537 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 656 | #459 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 730 | #407 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 782 | #399 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 855 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 908 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 1,095 | #320 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 1,189 | #305 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 1,330 | #274 | 5 | #19,006 |
| 2013 | 1,535 | #235 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 1,881 | #203 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 2,150 | #180 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 2,322 | #167 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 2,666 | #149 | 6 | #17,145 |
| 2008 | 2,827 | #147 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 3,061 | #136 | 5 | #20,354 |
| 2006 | 3,333 | #125 | 5 | #19,869 |
| 2005 | 3,682 | #112 | 6 | #16,316 |
| 2004 | 3,897 | #110 | 22 | #5,733 |
| 2003 | 4,387 | #99 | 7 | #13,759 |
| 2002 | 5,060 | #81 | 6 | #15,286 |
| 2001 | 5,396 | #76 | 9 | #10,968 |
| 2000 | 5,745 | #75 | 18 | #6,195 |
| 1999 | 6,256 | #66 | 12 | #8,195 |
| 1998 | 6,598 | #58 | 18 | #5,786 |
| 1997 | 6,001 | #62 | 15 | #6,469 |
| 1996 | 5,842 | #63 | 13 | #7,102 |
| 1995 | 6,009 | #61 | 17 | #5,670 |
| 1994 | 6,359 | #58 | 14 | #6,646 |
| 1993 | 6,011 | #64 | 17 | #5,661 |
| 1992 | 6,192 | #63 | 18 | #5,468 |
| 1991 | 5,531 | #69 | 22 | #4,643 |
| 1990 | 5,141 | #76 | 23 | #4,375 |
| 1989 | 4,166 | #83 | 11 | #7,425 |
| 1988 | 3,695 | #87 | 12 | #6,650 |
| 1987 | 3,236 | #93 | 26 | #3,520 |
| 1986 | 2,979 | #98 | 19 | #4,345 |
| 1985 | 2,822 | #104 | 23 | #3,725 |
| 1984 | 2,359 | #115 | 10 | #6,771 |
| 1983 | 2,051 | #130 | 22 | #3,679 |
| 1982 | 1,942 | #146 | 13 | #5,517 |
| 1981 | 1,757 | #155 | 16 | #4,729 |
| 1980 | 1,689 | #155 | 14 | #5,237 |
| 1979 | 1,700 | #153 | 19 | #4,043 |
| 1978 | 1,406 | #169 | 12 | #5,544 |
| 1977 | 1,431 | #168 | 8 | #7,523 |
| 1976 | 1,253 | #182 | 14 | #4,605 |
| 1975 | 1,267 | #180 | 5 | #10,525 |
| 1974 | 1,095 | #201 | 9 | #6,229 |
| 1973 | 1,027 | #214 | 19 | #3,473 |
| 1972 | 1,093 | #209 | 11 | #5,089 |
| 1971 | 1,093 | #214 | 13 | #4,526 |
| 1970 | 985 | #241 | 13 | #4,480 |
| 1969 | 810 | #258 | 12 | #4,407 |
| 1968 | 785 | #257 | 15 | #3,603 |
| 1967 | 800 | #251 | 6 | #6,752 |
| 1966 | 663 | #289 | 8 | #5,245 |
| 1965 | 211 | #529 | 7 | #5,776 |
| 1964 | 116 | #718 | 5 | #7,741 |
| 1963 | 142 | #657 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 80 | #849 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 65 | #958 | 6 | #6,518 |
| 1960 | 66 | #939 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 69 | #925 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 57 | #1,016 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 57 | #1,013 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 58 | #984 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 47 | #1,100 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 31 | #1,380 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 25 | #1,548 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 34 | #1,297 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 43 | #1,108 | 5 | #6,154 |
| 1950 | 34 | #1,254 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 29 | #1,375 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 44 | #1,076 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 49 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 24 | #1,470 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 22 | #1,439 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 17 | #1,730 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 15 | #1,984 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 19 | #1,677 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 12 | #2,197 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 16 | #1,798 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 17 | #1,707 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 13 | #2,081 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 12 | #2,188 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 12 | #2,172 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 15 | #1,918 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 18 | #1,722 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 10 | #2,526 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 14 | #2,090 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 9 | #2,853 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 13 | #2,283 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 20 | #1,722 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 8 | #3,334 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 9 | #3,128 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 9 | #3,122 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 13 | #2,424 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 12 | #2,624 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 18 | #1,938 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 10 | #2,996 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 10 | #2,973 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 7 | #3,785 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 12 | #2,501 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 7 | #3,687 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 8 | #3,190 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 16 | #1,938 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 17 | #1,779 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Trevor reached #58 in 1994. As a girl name, it reached #3,473 in 1973. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Trevor
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.