Is Jared a boy or girl name?
Jared is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 828 boys were named Jared, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.4% of the 206,307 US babies named Jared were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #393
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Jared since 1881
- 206,307
- Most popular year
- 1998
- 7,478 babies
Boys and girls named Jared, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 87 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 138 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 267 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 438 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 697 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 2,292 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 24,415 | 127 | 0.5% |
| 1980s | 60,307 | 345 | 0.6% |
| 1990s | 63,790 | 173 | 0.3% |
| 2000s | 38,017 | 111 | 0.3% |
| 2010s | 10,775 | 12 | 0.1% |
| 2020s | 4,306 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 828 | #393 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 971 | #343 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 857 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 805 | #394 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 845 | #368 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 911 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 890 | #367 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 845 | #385 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 833 | #384 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 1,010 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 1,191 | #297 | 7 | #13,676 |
| 2013 | 1,148 | #305 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 1,200 | #294 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 1,304 | #267 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 1,443 | #243 | 5 | #18,158 |
| 2009 | 1,754 | #214 | 9 | #11,872 |
| 2008 | 2,046 | #197 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 2,602 | #160 | 7 | #14,536 |
| 2006 | 2,976 | #138 | 10 | #10,941 |
| 2005 | 2,924 | #137 | 10 | #10,445 |
| 2004 | 3,178 | #128 | 17 | #6,912 |
| 2003 | 3,942 | #107 | 13 | #8,202 |
| 2002 | 4,837 | #84 | 11 | #9,107 |
| 2001 | 6,434 | #65 | 14 | #7,486 |
| 2000 | 7,324 | #56 | 20 | #5,568 |
| 1999 | 7,276 | #54 | 30 | #3,918 |
| 1998 | 7,462 | #51 | 16 | #6,177 |
| 1997 | 6,682 | #56 | 16 | #6,000 |
| 1996 | 5,821 | #64 | 17 | #5,629 |
| 1995 | 5,885 | #63 | 7 | #10,992 |
| 1994 | 5,875 | #63 | 15 | #6,122 |
| 1993 | 6,065 | #63 | 18 | #5,301 |
| 1992 | 5,867 | #67 | 11 | #7,725 |
| 1991 | 6,214 | #64 | 22 | #4,559 |
| 1990 | 6,643 | #63 | 21 | #4,581 |
| 1989 | 7,018 | #57 | 26 | #3,820 |
| 1988 | 6,210 | #60 | 39 | #2,716 |
| 1987 | 6,206 | #58 | 29 | #3,207 |
| 1986 | 6,118 | #58 | 26 | #3,393 |
| 1985 | 5,883 | #58 | 32 | #2,883 |
| 1984 | 5,685 | #59 | 40 | #2,398 |
| 1983 | 5,853 | #56 | 37 | #2,490 |
| 1982 | 6,263 | #54 | 47 | #2,163 |
| 1981 | 5,865 | #57 | 33 | #2,744 |
| 1980 | 5,206 | #61 | 36 | #2,622 |
| 1979 | 4,670 | #65 | 23 | #3,483 |
| 1978 | 3,847 | #72 | 16 | #4,339 |
| 1977 | 3,737 | #76 | 17 | #4,121 |
| 1976 | 2,930 | #90 | 23 | #3,131 |
| 1975 | 2,556 | #100 | 20 | #3,434 |
| 1974 | 2,005 | #131 | 9 | #5,940 |
| 1973 | 1,591 | #155 | 9 | #5,739 |
| 1972 | 1,258 | #187 | 5 | #8,767 |
| 1971 | 1,073 | #218 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 748 | #284 | 5 | #8,497 |
| 1969 | 686 | #286 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 519 | #337 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 348 | #407 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 258 | #478 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 99 | #747 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 81 | #848 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 89 | #804 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 76 | #876 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 74 | #892 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 62 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 73 | #901 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 79 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 73 | #887 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 80 | #837 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 67 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 90 | #753 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 60 | #929 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 57 | #946 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 54 | #955 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 64 | #857 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 46 | #1,039 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 50 | #995 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 44 | #1,100 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 44 | #1,037 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 36 | #1,093 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 41 | #1,026 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 49 | #967 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 44 | #1,015 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 50 | #900 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 34 | #1,145 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 43 | #963 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 46 | #933 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 38 | #1,043 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 25 | #1,344 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 23 | #1,438 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 16 | #1,813 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 14 | #1,959 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 18 | #1,750 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 20 | #1,612 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 24 | #1,514 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 16 | #1,965 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 18 | #1,869 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 18 | #1,915 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 11 | #2,648 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 11 | #2,666 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 19 | #1,868 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 15 | #2,175 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 8 | #3,388 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 11 | #2,710 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 11 | #2,675 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 11 | #2,583 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 12 | #2,461 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 15 | #2,041 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 12 | #2,332 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 15 | #1,925 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 6 | #3,080 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 5 | #3,043 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 6 | #2,416 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 5 | #1,717 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 5 | #1,040 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 5 | #940 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jared reached #51 in 1998. As a girl name, it reached #2,163 in 1982. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Jared
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.