Is Jasmine a boy or girl name?
Jasmine is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 1,527 girls and 0 boys were named Jasmine, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.5% of the 258,376 US babies named Jasmine were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #199
- Babies named Jasmine since 1906
- 258,376
- Most popular year
- 1993
- 12,110 babies
Boys and girls named Jasmine, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 38 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 46 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 21 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 327 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 346 | 100% |
| 1970s | 79 | 4,134 | 98.1% |
| 1980s | 530 | 32,952 | 98.4% |
| 1990s | 426 | 105,317 | 99.6% |
| 2000s | 203 | 76,076 | 99.7% |
| 2010s | 25 | 29,387 | 99.9% |
| 2020s | 0 | 8,453 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 1,527 | #199 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 1,589 | #191 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 1,680 | #177 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 1,723 | #170 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 1,934 | #141 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 2,110 | #131 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 2,142 | #137 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 2,273 | #130 |
| 2016 | 8 | #9,212 | 2,657 | #122 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 2,813 | #110 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 3,043 | #99 |
| 2013 | 5 | #12,945 | 3,065 | #103 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 3,393 | #83 |
| 2011 | 6 | #11,451 | 3,709 | #72 |
| 2010 | 6 | #11,342 | 4,182 | #62 |
| 2009 | 10 | #7,954 | 4,886 | #51 |
| 2008 | 12 | #6,939 | 5,535 | #43 |
| 2007 | 17 | #5,298 | 6,780 | #32 |
| 2006 | 14 | #5,910 | 7,521 | #29 |
| 2005 | 19 | #4,545 | 7,872 | #29 |
| 2004 | 41 | #2,614 | 8,492 | #26 |
| 2003 | 19 | #4,339 | 8,065 | #27 |
| 2002 | 31 | #2,973 | 8,868 | #26 |
| 2001 | 16 | #4,766 | 8,958 | #25 |
| 2000 | 24 | #3,469 | 9,099 | #27 |
| 1999 | 20 | #3,758 | 9,351 | #26 |
| 1998 | 27 | #2,967 | 9,485 | #26 |
| 1997 | 22 | #3,299 | 9,680 | #24 |
| 1996 | 36 | #2,272 | 9,707 | #28 |
| 1995 | 34 | #2,317 | 10,279 | #25 |
| 1994 | 48 | #1,807 | 11,713 | #23 |
| 1993 | 48 | #1,779 | 12,062 | #23 |
| 1992 | 39 | #2,018 | 10,478 | #28 |
| 1991 | 54 | #1,580 | 11,525 | #24 |
| 1990 | 98 | #1,077 | 11,037 | #28 |
| 1989 | 151 | #808 | 9,550 | #30 |
| 1988 | 94 | #1,008 | 6,446 | #53 |
| 1987 | 65 | #1,199 | 3,723 | #79 |
| 1986 | 51 | #1,393 | 2,992 | #95 |
| 1985 | 42 | #1,554 | 2,708 | #103 |
| 1984 | 30 | #1,860 | 1,928 | #149 |
| 1983 | 22 | #2,305 | 1,568 | #175 |
| 1982 | 17 | #2,758 | 1,448 | #189 |
| 1981 | 39 | #1,562 | 1,402 | #191 |
| 1980 | 19 | #2,577 | 1,187 | #216 |
| 1979 | 17 | #2,709 | 1,039 | #245 |
| 1978 | 19 | #2,421 | 797 | #291 |
| 1977 | 15 | #2,830 | 720 | #327 |
| 1976 | 8 | #4,187 | 525 | #391 |
| 1975 | 13 | #2,983 | 382 | #481 |
| 1974 | 7 | #4,370 | 283 | #572 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 149 | #863 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,193 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,303 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,521 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,637 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,759 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,456 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,839 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,131 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,375 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,108 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,381 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,012 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,997 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,863 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,184 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,513 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,588 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,708 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,785 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,899 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,290 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,033 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,973 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,908 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,864 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,285 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,256 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,870 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,311 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,619 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,548 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,216 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,645 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,661 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,210 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,142 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,269 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,494 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,080 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jasmine reached #808 in 1989. As a girl name, it reached #23 in 1993. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Jasmine
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.