Is Verner a boy or girl name?
Verner was mostly a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 8% of the 2,134 US babies named Verner were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Verner since 1881
- 2,134
- Most popular year
- 1917
- 79 babies
Boys and girls named Verner, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 52 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 85 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 103 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 468 | 55 | 10.5% |
| 1920s | 503 | 71 | 12.4% |
| 1930s | 272 | 35 | 11.4% |
| 1940s | 201 | 5 | 2.4% |
| 1950s | 141 | 5 | 3.4% |
| 1960s | 83 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 35 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 5 | #12,047 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 5 | #10,094 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 5 | #7,295 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 5 | #7,253 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 7 | #4,783 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 8 | #4,169 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 7 | #4,483 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 5 | #5,719 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 8 | #3,822 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 13 | #2,440 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 5 | #4,527 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 5 | #4,507 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 5 | #4,409 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 13 | #2,403 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 14 | #2,295 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 7 | #3,625 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 10 | #2,888 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 11 | #2,679 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 10 | #2,811 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 12 | #2,496 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 12 | #2,487 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 7 | #3,523 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 15 | #2,133 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 16 | #2,040 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 22 | #1,673 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 17 | #1,933 | 5 | #6,356 |
| 1951 | 15 | #2,051 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 15 | #2,015 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 12 | #2,331 | 5 | #6,024 |
| 1948 | 13 | #2,215 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 23 | #1,597 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 24 | #1,473 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 19 | #1,576 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 22 | #1,478 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 21 | #1,574 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 30 | #1,297 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 23 | #1,443 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 14 | #1,979 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 18 | #1,631 | 7 | #3,765 |
| 1938 | 25 | #1,361 | 5 | #4,959 |
| 1937 | 17 | #1,749 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 27 | #1,294 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 21 | #1,537 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 25 | #1,384 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 27 | #1,309 | 6 | #4,192 |
| 1932 | 41 | #1,055 | 12 | #2,633 |
| 1931 | 31 | #1,252 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 40 | #1,113 | 5 | #5,219 |
| 1929 | 36 | #1,170 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 50 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 45 | #1,058 | 6 | #4,768 |
| 1926 | 43 | #1,089 | 7 | #4,285 |
| 1925 | 47 | #1,009 | 5 | #5,728 |
| 1924 | 44 | #1,091 | 11 | #3,137 |
| 1923 | 51 | #973 | 7 | #4,354 |
| 1922 | 59 | #913 | 15 | #2,472 |
| 1921 | 63 | #883 | 13 | #2,758 |
| 1920 | 65 | #844 | 7 | #4,373 |
| 1919 | 68 | #787 | 8 | #3,788 |
| 1918 | 67 | #803 | 8 | #3,847 |
| 1917 | 70 | #747 | 9 | #3,331 |
| 1916 | 49 | #915 | 12 | #2,648 |
| 1915 | 61 | #773 | 6 | #4,239 |
| 1914 | 54 | #711 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 44 | #695 | 12 | #1,874 |
| 1912 | 31 | #798 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 13 | #977 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 11 | #1,039 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 9 | #1,080 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 10 | #942 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 13 | #773 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 7 | #1,106 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 13 | #696 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 12 | #720 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 5 | #1,297 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 8 | #925 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 15 | #533 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 11 | #835 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 9 | #802 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 11 | #678 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 8 | #892 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 6 | #1,076 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 17 | #500 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 6 | #1,022 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 12 | #637 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 10 | #632 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 6 | #989 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 14 | #522 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 9 | #752 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 7 | #817 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 9 | #691 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 8 | #761 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 5 | #987 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Verner reached #500 in 1894. As a girl name, it reached #1,874 in 1913. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Verner
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.