Is Vernita a boy or girl name?
Vernita was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 4,027 US babies named Vernita were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Vernita since 1899
- 4,027
- Most popular year
- 1961
- 123 babies
Boys and girls named Vernita, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 28 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 171 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 363 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 373 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 434 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 935 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 914 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 463 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 246 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 85 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 5 | #20,046 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,348 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,482 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,593 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,605 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,641 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,968 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,827 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,538 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,888 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,120 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,641 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,326 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,421 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,546 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,339 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,721 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,649 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,577 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,384 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,213 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,543 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,837 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,801 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,060 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,723 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,585 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,388 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,401 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,374 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,171 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,231 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,167 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,152 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,035 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,053 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 123 | #976 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,058 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,021 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 96 | #1,074 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,062 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 115 | #943 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 104 | #982 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 112 | #912 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,039 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,128 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,076 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,108 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,134 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,195 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,236 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,256 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,481 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,575 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,365 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,152 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,537 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,202 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,129 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,199 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,195 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,204 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,352 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,261 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,084 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,146 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,162 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,273 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,106 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,177 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,482 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,323 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,294 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,564 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,386 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,282 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,475 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,308 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,599 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,358 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,260 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,863 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,616 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,253 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,025 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,348 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,182 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,600 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,044 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,937 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,717 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,094 |
Highest rank
Vernita has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #912 in 1954. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Vernita
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.