Is Waldo a boy or girl name?
Waldo was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 5,717 US babies named Waldo were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Waldo since 1880
- 5,717
- Most popular year
- 1915
- 174 babies
Boys and girls named Waldo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 134 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 196 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 228 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 1,178 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,355 | 6 | 0.4% |
| 1930s | 820 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 471 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 359 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 278 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 154 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 188 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 155 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 113 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 66 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 16 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 10 | #8,121 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 6 | #11,928 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 10 | #8,169 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 11 | #7,505 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 9 | #8,766 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 8 | #9,509 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 5 | #13,963 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 5 | #13,957 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 8 | #9,663 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 10 | #8,100 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 12 | #7,209 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 12 | #7,161 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 10 | #8,138 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 10 | #7,966 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 8 | #9,060 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 13 | #6,119 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 14 | #5,541 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 10 | #7,015 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 12 | #5,993 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 12 | #5,898 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 13 | #5,306 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 15 | #4,637 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 17 | #4,049 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 13 | #4,865 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 15 | #4,265 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 13 | #4,789 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 13 | #4,685 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 18 | #3,600 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 19 | #3,318 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 19 | #3,304 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 29 | #2,353 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 26 | #2,361 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 16 | #3,194 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 15 | #3,261 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 18 | #2,824 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 16 | #2,948 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 24 | #2,204 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 16 | #2,967 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 13 | #3,408 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 15 | #3,090 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 19 | #2,567 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 14 | #3,066 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 18 | #2,550 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 17 | #2,592 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 10 | #3,652 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 19 | #2,273 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 13 | #2,853 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 15 | #2,530 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 19 | #2,201 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 10 | #3,274 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 24 | #1,724 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 23 | #1,692 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 17 | #1,970 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 20 | #1,754 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 26 | #1,554 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 31 | #1,433 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 43 | #1,193 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 25 | #1,624 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 38 | #1,299 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 31 | #1,461 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 29 | #1,499 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 25 | #1,590 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 30 | #1,455 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 42 | #1,190 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 39 | #1,215 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 35 | #1,292 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 41 | #1,169 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 42 | #1,150 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 38 | #1,193 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 38 | #1,179 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 28 | #1,406 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 41 | #1,125 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 47 | #1,063 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 46 | #1,017 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 38 | #1,055 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 43 | #1,003 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 58 | #884 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 62 | #833 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 51 | #896 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 57 | #839 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 66 | #743 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 63 | #778 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 63 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 92 | #610 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 70 | #738 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 76 | #703 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 85 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 96 | #605 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 95 | #610 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 114 | #563 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 116 | #549 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 110 | #592 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 124 | #557 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 132 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 121 | #565 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 163 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 139 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 149 | #508 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 153 | #499 | 6 | #5,080 |
| 1920 | 148 | #497 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 124 | #537 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 163 | #463 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 164 | #442 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 154 | #454 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 174 | #407 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 124 | #434 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 116 | #400 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 79 | #444 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 44 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 36 | #460 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 17 | #676 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 36 | #396 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 27 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 18 | #566 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 24 | #462 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 25 | #430 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 22 | #448 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 22 | #459 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 15 | #534 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 22 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 24 | #383 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 21 | #449 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 22 | #409 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 14 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 20 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 17 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 19 | #433 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 22 | #414 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 15 | #474 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 22 | #386 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 18 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 15 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 14 | #486 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 8 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 17 | #460 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 7 | #842 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 6 | #883 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 16 | #468 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 23 | #347 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 10 | #636 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Waldo reached #347 in 1881. As a girl name, it reached #5,080 in 1921. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.