Is Era a boy or girl name?
Era is mostly a girl name in the US. In 2024, 57 girls and 8 boys were named Era, so 87.7% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.1% of the 5,944 US babies named Era were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #9,221
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,890
- Babies named Era since 1880
- 5,944
- Most popular year
- 1916
- 157 babies
Boys and girls named Era, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 169 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 522 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 746 | 100% |
| 1910s | 12 | 1,207 | 99% |
| 1920s | 16 | 1,141 | 98.6% |
| 1930s | 0 | 554 | 100% |
| 1940s | 6 | 361 | 98.4% |
| 1950s | 0 | 248 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 129 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 104 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 49 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 39 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 116 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 268 | 100% |
| 2020s | 20 | 237 | 92.2% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8 | #9,221 | 57 | #2,890 |
| 2023 | 7 | #10,040 | 41 | #3,724 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,232 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,356 |
| 2020 | 5 | #12,612 | 42 | #3,566 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,568 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,948 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,601 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,188 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,174 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,855 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,091 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,416 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,658 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,022 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,178 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,518 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,671 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,834 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,031 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,520 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,246 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,448 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,051 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 6 | #13,199 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,936 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,199 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,260 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,236 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 5 | #13,641 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 6 | #11,258 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,249 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,291 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,599 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,597 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,435 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,511 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,298 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,614 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,972 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,384 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,810 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,705 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,607 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,373 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,104 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,363 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,332 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,635 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,799 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,802 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,750 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,102 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,077 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,363 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,404 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,205 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,693 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,589 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,560 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,236 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,957 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,088 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,834 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,897 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,845 |
| 1949 | 6 | #3,437 | 24 | #1,976 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,524 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,364 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,485 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,297 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,297 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,537 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,252 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,361 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,155 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,091 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 61 | #906 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,147 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,070 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 55 | #941 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 57 | #908 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 64 | #839 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 61 | #901 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 59 | #901 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 72 | #840 |
| 1929 | 6 | #3,683 | 83 | #770 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 81 | #795 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 107 | #704 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 117 | #669 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 122 | #670 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 114 | #696 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 122 | #672 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 131 | #640 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 135 | #638 |
| 1920 | 10 | #2,831 | 129 | #635 |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,362 | 150 | #565 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 142 | #598 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 145 | #561 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 157 | #526 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 145 | #522 |
| 1914 | 7 | #2,738 | 118 | #515 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 95 | #522 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 86 | #522 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 78 | #463 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 91 | #414 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 79 | #411 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 77 | #411 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 84 | #387 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 66 | #422 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 67 | #416 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 87 | #349 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 79 | #355 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 68 | #382 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 65 | #371 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 74 | #387 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 48 | #423 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 84 | #340 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 72 | #344 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 54 | #385 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 47 | #413 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 46 | #410 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 43 | #408 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 34 | #467 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 45 | #372 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 49 | #363 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 26 | #488 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 26 | #492 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 21 | #492 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 19 | #513 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 21 | #461 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 15 | #548 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 14 | #527 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 7 | #764 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 9 | #594 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 11 | #528 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Era reached #2,738 in 1914. As a girl name, it reached #340 in 1898. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Era
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.