Is Zana a boy or girl name?
Zana is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 25 girls and 0 boys were named Zana, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,261 US babies named Zana were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #5,277
- Babies named Zana since 1882
- 2,261
- Most popular year
- 1994
- 252 babies
Boys and girls named Zana, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 20 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 30 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 25 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 94 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 145 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 122 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 138 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 187 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 142 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 97 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 112 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 556 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 272 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 218 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 103 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,277 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,230 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,900 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,014 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,072 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,904 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,780 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,801 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,628 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,027 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,050 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,025 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,552 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,421 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,177 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 27 | #5,373 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 23 | #6,125 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,227 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,700 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,192 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,283 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,413 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,495 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,686 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,644 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,894 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,137 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,775 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,509 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,862 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 252 | #804 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,157 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,508 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,583 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,494 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,157 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,495 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,984 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,457 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,455 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,149 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,307 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,369 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,103 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,413 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,186 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,644 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,339 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,599 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,169 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,008 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,663 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,553 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,941 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,350 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,053 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,219 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,842 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,865 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,049 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,673 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,064 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,860 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,544 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,819 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,979 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,542 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,562 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,909 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,552 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,986 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,104 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,410 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,181 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,252 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,513 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,347 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,529 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,390 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,456 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,624 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,694 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,732 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,027 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,961 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,427 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,224 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,195 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,031 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,428 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,421 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,686 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,129 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,425 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,039 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,564 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,283 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,338 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,163 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,377 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,808 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,263 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,441 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,926 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,588 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,513 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,804 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,087 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,830 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,127 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,608 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,823 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,980 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,865 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,672 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,058 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,926 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,940 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,697 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,821 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,483 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,169 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,531 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 9 | #958 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,022 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,027 |
Highest rank
Zana has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #804 in 1994. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Zana
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.