Is Britt a boy or girl name?
Britt is used for both, more often for boys in the US. In 2024, 6 girls and 19 boys were named Britt, so 24% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 38.2% of the 7,625 US babies named Britt were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,075
- Girl rank, 2024
- #13,730
- Babies named Britt since 1886
- 7,625
- Most popular year
- 1970
- 249 babies
Boys and girls named Britt, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 46 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 60 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 61 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 162 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 701 | 51 | 6.8% |
| 1960s | 1,075 | 478 | 30.8% |
| 1970s | 854 | 1,146 | 57.3% |
| 1980s | 767 | 787 | 50.6% |
| 1990s | 534 | 249 | 31.8% |
| 2000s | 242 | 128 | 34.6% |
| 2010s | 139 | 70 | 33.5% |
| 2020s | 58 | 6 | 9.4% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19 | #5,075 | 6 | #13,730 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 13 | #6,536 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 11 | #7,163 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 15 | #5,744 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 8 | #9,021 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 9 | #8,258 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 8 | #8,964 | 6 | #14,459 |
| 2016 | 19 | #4,975 | 7 | #13,141 |
| 2015 | 11 | #7,140 | 9 | #11,050 |
| 2014 | 11 | #7,138 | 12 | #9,073 |
| 2013 | 21 | #4,493 | 11 | #9,722 |
| 2012 | 12 | #6,682 | 7 | #13,748 |
| 2011 | 20 | #4,676 | 13 | #8,711 |
| 2010 | 20 | #4,698 | 5 | #17,496 |
| 2009 | 12 | #6,860 | 11 | #10,096 |
| 2008 | 17 | #5,280 | 8 | #12,785 |
| 2007 | 20 | #4,658 | 10 | #10,954 |
| 2006 | 24 | #4,015 | 11 | #10,031 |
| 2005 | 33 | #3,097 | 9 | #11,073 |
| 2004 | 23 | #3,876 | 14 | #7,900 |
| 2003 | 21 | #3,995 | 20 | #5,850 |
| 2002 | 27 | #3,271 | 22 | #5,288 |
| 2001 | 31 | #2,939 | 10 | #9,476 |
| 2000 | 34 | #2,680 | 13 | #7,651 |
| 1999 | 47 | #2,029 | 20 | #5,259 |
| 1998 | 31 | #2,658 | 20 | #5,163 |
| 1997 | 36 | #2,316 | 16 | #5,921 |
| 1996 | 49 | #1,842 | 32 | #3,515 |
| 1995 | 41 | #2,031 | 26 | #3,989 |
| 1994 | 48 | #1,797 | 24 | #4,261 |
| 1993 | 59 | #1,542 | 19 | #5,024 |
| 1992 | 57 | #1,547 | 26 | #3,980 |
| 1991 | 77 | #1,273 | 26 | #3,951 |
| 1990 | 89 | #1,149 | 40 | #2,857 |
| 1989 | 79 | #1,207 | 58 | #2,122 |
| 1988 | 86 | #1,072 | 52 | #2,190 |
| 1987 | 70 | #1,141 | 51 | #2,135 |
| 1986 | 106 | #880 | 68 | #1,720 |
| 1985 | 67 | #1,134 | 71 | #1,651 |
| 1984 | 77 | #1,013 | 80 | #1,448 |
| 1983 | 63 | #1,133 | 85 | #1,390 |
| 1982 | 67 | #1,116 | 97 | #1,302 |
| 1981 | 82 | #1,003 | 132 | #1,069 |
| 1980 | 70 | #1,079 | 93 | #1,351 |
| 1979 | 77 | #1,011 | 106 | #1,226 |
| 1978 | 47 | #1,328 | 106 | #1,186 |
| 1977 | 70 | #1,030 | 101 | #1,207 |
| 1976 | 59 | #1,100 | 93 | #1,218 |
| 1975 | 81 | #911 | 99 | #1,163 |
| 1974 | 82 | #894 | 112 | #1,055 |
| 1973 | 94 | #817 | 142 | #883 |
| 1972 | 98 | #810 | 141 | #893 |
| 1971 | 115 | #765 | 128 | #984 |
| 1970 | 131 | #717 | 118 | #1,045 |
| 1969 | 100 | #776 | 122 | #970 |
| 1968 | 112 | #711 | 56 | #1,520 |
| 1967 | 123 | #672 | 48 | #1,643 |
| 1966 | 79 | #821 | 67 | #1,322 |
| 1965 | 75 | #849 | 44 | #1,691 |
| 1964 | 121 | #704 | 58 | #1,482 |
| 1963 | 110 | #738 | 26 | #2,375 |
| 1962 | 114 | #719 | 16 | #3,172 |
| 1961 | 99 | #774 | 22 | #2,618 |
| 1960 | 142 | #654 | 19 | #2,824 |
| 1959 | 119 | #706 | 15 | #3,115 |
| 1958 | 84 | #820 | 13 | #3,390 |
| 1957 | 105 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 63 | #940 | 8 | #4,495 |
| 1955 | 73 | #862 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 85 | #774 | 7 | #4,712 |
| 1953 | 47 | #1,061 | 8 | #4,272 |
| 1952 | 54 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 37 | #1,197 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 34 | #1,234 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 24 | #1,509 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 28 | #1,380 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 16 | #1,926 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 21 | #1,560 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 14 | #1,858 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 8 | #2,658 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 24 | #1,433 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 12 | #2,159 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 9 | #2,508 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 6 | #3,169 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 6 | #3,152 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 9 | #2,503 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 8 | #2,699 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 7 | #2,893 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 9 | #2,550 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 7 | #3,010 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 7 | #3,124 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 8 | #3,055 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 9 | #2,793 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 7 | #3,492 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 9 | #2,937 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 12 | #2,491 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 10 | #2,788 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 7 | #3,566 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 6 | #3,876 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 10 | #2,714 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 6 | #3,605 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 10 | #2,571 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 7 | #3,127 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 13 | #1,792 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 6 | #949 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 5 | #983 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Britt reached #654 in 1960. As a girl name, it reached #883 in 1973. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Britt
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.