Is Dorinda a boy or girl name?
Dorinda was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 4,801 US babies named Dorinda were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Dorinda since 1892
- 4,801
- Most popular year
- 1957
- 202 babies
Boys and girls named Dorinda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 0 | 44 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 83 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 125 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 662 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,401 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,459 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 642 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 209 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 101 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 50 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 19 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,145 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,600 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,370 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 5 | #18,070 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 7 | #14,331 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,992 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,383 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,425 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,345 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,023 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,827 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,054 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,015 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,265 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,076 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,238 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,796 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,085 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,626 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,914 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,886 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,910 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,230 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,889 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,441 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,172 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,553 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,363 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,815 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,281 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,318 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,135 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,621 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,918 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,392 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,529 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,475 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 95 | #1,195 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,069 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 118 | #995 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 127 | #918 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 124 | #920 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 124 | #905 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 129 | #878 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 150 | #851 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 180 | #769 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 194 | #739 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 146 | #890 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 167 | #796 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 166 | #792 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 172 | #759 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 202 | #700 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 197 | #683 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 135 | #834 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 129 | #828 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 127 | #822 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 120 | #836 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,171 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 89 | #950 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 82 | #993 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 104 | #858 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 91 | #931 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 72 | #988 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 81 | #841 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 147 | #606 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,849 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,715 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,968 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,756 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,693 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,139 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,910 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,705 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,126 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,553 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,439 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,105 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,335 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,750 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,978 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,821 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,357 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,096 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,600 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,147 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,743 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,987 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,624 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,937 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,975 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,764 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,339 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,899 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,309 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,719 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,321 |
Highest rank
Dorinda has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #606 in 1944. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Dorinda
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.