Is Dottie a boy or girl name?
Dottie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 158 girls and 0 boys were named Dottie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 9,836 US babies named Dottie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,406
- Babies named Dottie since 1881
- 9,836
- Most popular year
- 1943
- 278 babies
Boys and girls named Dottie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 94 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 204 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 213 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 400 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 813 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,210 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 2,265 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,704 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,122 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 494 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 228 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 67 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 64 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 352 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 606 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 158 | #1,406 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 147 | #1,480 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 129 | #1,637 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 95 | #2,029 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 77 | #2,307 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,658 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,849 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,792 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,106 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,864 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,943 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,451 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,406 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,310 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,964 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,438 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 13 | #9,114 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 8 | #13,021 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,728 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,661 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,480 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,425 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 6 | #13,143 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,828 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,383 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,134 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,266 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,036 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,116 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,729 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 6 | #11,926 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,506 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 9 | #8,231 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,126 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,372 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,787 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,645 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,690 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,359 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,555 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,459 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,225 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,222 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,061 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,170 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,108 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,070 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,003 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,653 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,634 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,668 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,446 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,469 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,408 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,205 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,253 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,189 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 131 | #913 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 119 | #975 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 137 | #902 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 188 | #758 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 185 | #751 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 171 | #781 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 215 | #675 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 201 | #702 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 175 | #731 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 150 | #787 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 146 | #775 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 157 | #726 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 170 | #687 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 161 | #691 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 158 | #676 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 148 | #693 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 202 | #587 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 232 | #560 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 245 | #498 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 240 | #463 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 275 | #434 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 278 | #447 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 235 | #481 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 212 | #481 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 198 | #485 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 128 | #591 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 139 | #584 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 136 | #579 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 133 | #569 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 123 | #582 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 127 | #572 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 104 | #645 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 133 | #566 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 92 | #697 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 95 | #711 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 109 | #671 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 102 | #692 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 121 | #655 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 81 | #808 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 65 | #923 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 59 | #994 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 65 | #908 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 81 | #809 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 63 | #937 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 67 | #887 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 69 | #836 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 63 | #903 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 51 | #981 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 53 | #943 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,058 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,395 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,074 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 31 | #907 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 30 | #792 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,129 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 21 | #894 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 31 | #701 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 15 | #998 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 21 | #802 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 33 | #609 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,289 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 15 | #904 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 27 | #644 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 19 | #750 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 22 | #784 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 25 | #619 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 24 | #667 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 23 | #648 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 20 | #710 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 29 | #549 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 12 | #915 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 17 | #725 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 16 | #737 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 15 | #701 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 23 | #551 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 10 | #854 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 16 | #647 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 15 | #592 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 12 | #665 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 10 | #702 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 9 | #751 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 5 | #955 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 10 | #607 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 7 | #697 |
Highest rank
Dottie has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #434 in 1944. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1940s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.