Is Gilda a boy or girl name?
Gilda is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 10 girls and 0 boys were named Gilda, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 10,077 US babies named Gilda were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #9,766
- Babies named Gilda since 1898
- 10,077
- Most popular year
- 1947
- 346 babies
Boys and girls named Gilda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 94 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 899 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 2,160 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,224 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,520 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 2,079 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 912 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 462 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 265 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 262 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 92 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 62 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 40 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,766 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,592 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,652 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,574 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,726 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,189 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,173 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,213 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,814 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,619 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,692 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 5 | #18,266 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 6 | #16,169 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 7 | #14,082 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,637 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,467 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,622 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,463 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,453 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,299 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,298 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,015 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,932 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,110 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,395 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,786 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,065 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,824 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,752 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,458 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,930 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,937 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,895 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,583 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,451 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,940 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,871 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,972 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,275 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,361 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,954 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,097 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,628 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,309 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,758 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,080 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,811 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,637 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,587 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,520 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,576 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,564 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,339 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,255 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,159 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,148 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,017 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,009 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 123 | #973 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 137 | #898 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 140 | #875 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 144 | #851 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 172 | #762 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 179 | #721 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 193 | #674 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 249 | #564 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 242 | #562 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 263 | #523 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 265 | #508 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 232 | #541 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 244 | #528 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 281 | #479 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 346 | #441 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 305 | #442 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 68 | #920 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 61 | #994 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,309 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,056 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,038 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 71 | #850 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 75 | #794 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 72 | #833 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 81 | #754 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 74 | #788 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 112 | #615 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 110 | #637 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 123 | #580 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 188 | #482 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 179 | #479 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 210 | #464 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 257 | #414 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 291 | #393 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 321 | #381 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 293 | #401 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 200 | #497 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 202 | #490 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 148 | #596 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 164 | #557 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 154 | #584 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 130 | #629 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 125 | #628 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 115 | #663 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 135 | #586 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 123 | #609 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 101 | #659 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 96 | #578 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 78 | #578 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 50 | #714 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 42 | #670 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 34 | #732 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 23 | #854 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 26 | #759 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 17 | #930 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,623 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,403 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,673 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,504 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,585 |
Highest rank
Gilda has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #381 in 1927. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1940s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Gilda
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.