Is Lizabeth a boy or girl name?
Lizabeth is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 15 girls and 0 boys were named Lizabeth, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 5,603 US babies named Lizabeth were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #7,416
- Babies named Lizabeth since 1907
- 5,603
- Most popular year
- 1958
- 189 babies
Boys and girls named Lizabeth, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 31 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 49 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 149 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 386 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,325 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,128 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 611 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 595 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 562 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 460 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 249 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 52 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,416 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,606 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,108 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,490 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,920 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,887 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,708 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,698 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,592 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,734 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,321 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,153 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,560 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,315 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,555 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 23 | #6,013 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 39 | #4,056 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,955 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,119 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,349 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,109 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 70 | #2,385 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,398 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,030 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,247 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,767 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,049 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 49 | #2,609 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,440 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,762 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,963 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,891 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,500 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,947 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,332 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,952 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 52 | #2,201 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,802 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,898 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,776 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,950 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,942 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,041 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,837 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,618 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,823 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,742 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,965 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,761 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,083 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,676 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,336 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,661 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,421 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,266 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,121 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,259 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 96 | #1,063 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 125 | #902 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 121 | #919 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 103 | #1,075 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,024 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 116 | #999 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 147 | #884 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 137 | #901 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 138 | #887 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 189 | #718 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 136 | #875 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 135 | #859 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 132 | #846 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 129 | #829 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 139 | #778 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 128 | #802 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 97 | #942 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 102 | #881 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 106 | #857 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 85 | #943 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,005 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,201 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,915 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,468 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,022 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,955 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,420 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,104 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,681 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,400 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,963 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,988 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,661 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,048 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,940 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,954 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,529 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,497 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,887 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,619 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,609 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,525 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,537 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,553 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,486 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,068 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,095 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,177 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,046 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,468 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,960 |
Highest rank
Lizabeth has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #718 in 1958. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lizabeth
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.