Is Liza a boy or girl name?
Liza is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 111 girls and 0 boys were named Liza, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 17,526 US babies named Liza were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,806
- Babies named Liza since 1880
- 17,526
- Most popular year
- 1973
- 518 babies
Boys and girls named Liza, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 223 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 271 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 225 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 347 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 306 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 229 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 299 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 763 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 2,694 | 100% |
| 1970s | 9 | 4,264 | 99.8% |
| 1980s | 5 | 3,082 | 99.8% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,802 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,244 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,154 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 609 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 111 | #1,806 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 125 | #1,661 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 119 | #1,748 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 138 | #1,529 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,737 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 132 | #1,611 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,668 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,785 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 115 | #1,806 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,691 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 122 | #1,721 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,803 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,866 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,962 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 93 | #2,132 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,738 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,972 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,982 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 103 | #1,952 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,711 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,706 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 145 | #1,384 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 133 | #1,439 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 156 | #1,262 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 140 | #1,351 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 145 | #1,278 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 158 | #1,182 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 142 | #1,256 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 184 | #1,016 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 170 | #1,058 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 183 | #1,016 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 184 | #1,010 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 193 | #990 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 224 | #881 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 219 | #887 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 265 | #745 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 242 | #777 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 233 | #769 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 220 | #775 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 242 | #714 |
| 1984 | 5 | #6,938 | 283 | #628 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 323 | #564 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 393 | #510 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 421 | #489 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 460 | #462 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 448 | #454 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 417 | #474 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 498 | #411 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 432 | #448 |
| 1975 | 9 | #3,821 | 435 | #450 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 392 | #459 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 518 | #392 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 374 | #479 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 340 | #537 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 410 | #489 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 315 | #557 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 312 | #549 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 317 | #530 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 340 | #514 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 348 | #509 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 287 | #585 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 230 | #665 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 200 | #732 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 210 | #719 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 135 | #912 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 153 | #831 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 113 | #975 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,053 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,648 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,259 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,269 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,233 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,294 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,248 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,219 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,582 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,802 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,518 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,453 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,393 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,841 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,435 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,897 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,722 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,499 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,617 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,842 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,962 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,838 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,529 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,743 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,430 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,585 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,306 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,588 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,665 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,619 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,442 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,316 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,396 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,196 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,239 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,553 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,896 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,458 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,468 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,173 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,070 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,320 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,356 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,109 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 35 | #904 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 35 | #855 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 32 | #772 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 42 | #660 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 22 | #883 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 23 | #816 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 18 | #910 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 29 | #684 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 21 | #814 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 15 | #953 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 20 | #775 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 30 | #609 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 21 | #712 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 26 | #716 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 31 | #544 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 22 | #706 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 25 | #622 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 27 | #602 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 20 | #714 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 27 | #565 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 23 | #608 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 30 | #500 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 26 | #511 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 40 | #402 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 28 | #472 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 28 | #475 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 26 | #439 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 27 | #423 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 19 | #494 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 18 | #491 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 20 | #428 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 16 | #470 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 23 | #345 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 18 | #398 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Liza reached #3,821 in 1975. As a girl name, it reached #345 in 1881. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Liza
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.