Is Loree a boy or girl name?
Loree was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 3,474 US babies named Loree were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Loree since 1896
- 3,474
- Most popular year
- 1963
- 104 babies
Boys and girls named Loree, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 70 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 321 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 431 | 100% |
| 1930s | 5 | 253 | 98.1% |
| 1940s | 0 | 251 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 588 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 834 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 421 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 203 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 52 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 24 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,616 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,285 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,039 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,882 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,230 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 7 | #11,292 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,126 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,158 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,570 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,976 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,430 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,009 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,483 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 12 | #6,176 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,127 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,743 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,631 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,294 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,488 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,895 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,628 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,456 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,773 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,405 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,362 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,306 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,895 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,676 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,115 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,891 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,566 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,431 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,169 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,330 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,256 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,082 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,207 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,053 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 93 | #1,134 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,220 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,208 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,220 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,357 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,232 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,174 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,201 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,371 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,292 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,309 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,514 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,980 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,462 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,887 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,842 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,545 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,685 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,162 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,870 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,898 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,780 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,936 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,367 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,425 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,404 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,536 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,586 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,302 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,579 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,503 |
| 1931 | 5 | #4,106 | 25 | #1,530 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,361 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,205 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,325 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,085 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,191 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,456 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,113 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,294 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,137 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,049 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,067 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,069 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,174 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,156 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,158 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,109 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,137 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,015 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,099 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,505 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 26 | #853 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,255 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,493 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,578 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,381 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,580 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,175 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,390 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,662 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,148 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,365 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Loree reached #4,106 in 1931. As a girl name, it reached #853 in 1910. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Loree
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.