Is Loreen a boy or girl name?
Loreen was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,588 US babies named Loreen were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #14,486
- Babies named Loreen since 1898
- 3,588
- Most popular year
- 1964
- 128 babies
Boys and girls named Loreen, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 38 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 114 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 242 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 217 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 506 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 865 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 993 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 276 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 147 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 69 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 32 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 63 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 20 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,486 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,817 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,526 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,986 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,909 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,189 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,506 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,904 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,686 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,927 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,890 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,302 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 9 | #12,249 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,040 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,883 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,231 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,778 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 7 | #11,545 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 7 | #11,293 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 7 | #11,263 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,432 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,046 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,028 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,136 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,368 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,917 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,576 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,283 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,764 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,100 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,587 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,259 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,445 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,233 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,060 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,003 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,879 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,608 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,582 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,796 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,796 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,198 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,950 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,567 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,538 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,275 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,135 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,139 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 89 | #1,126 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 128 | #931 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 116 | #990 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,073 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 124 | #968 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 125 | #957 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,109 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 115 | #965 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,018 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,036 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,005 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 103 | #953 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,133 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,266 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,138 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,290 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,097 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 77 | #999 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,063 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,141 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,109 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,394 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,201 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,578 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,175 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,262 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,367 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,622 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,522 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,537 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,967 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,629 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,941 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,726 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,716 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,074 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,581 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,526 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,649 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,567 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,722 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,904 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,130 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,596 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,336 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,643 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,506 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,599 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,266 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,918 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,845 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,948 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,250 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,261 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,394 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,300 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,852 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,627 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,321 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,846 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,614 |
Highest rank
Loreen has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #931 in 1964. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Loreen
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.