Is Loris a boy or girl name?
Loris was used for both, more often for girls in the US. Across 1880–2024, 74.6% of the 2,280 US babies named Loris were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #13,410
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Loris since 1903
- 2,280
- Most popular year
- 1935
- 78 babies
Boys and girls named Loris, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 18 | 100% |
| 1910s | 104 | 155 | 59.8% |
| 1920s | 165 | 366 | 68.9% |
| 1930s | 117 | 387 | 76.8% |
| 1940s | 99 | 243 | 71.1% |
| 1950s | 40 | 250 | 86.2% |
| 1960s | 31 | 135 | 81.3% |
| 1970s | 0 | 80 | 100% |
| 1980s | 5 | 29 | 85.3% |
| 1990s | 0 | 22 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| 2010s | 13 | 5 | 27.8% |
| 2020s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | #13,410 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,020 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 7 | #10,358 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 6 | #11,564 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 5 | #18,086 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,606 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,848 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,767 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,572 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,892 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 5 | #13,629 |
| 1988 | 5 | #8,040 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,435 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,705 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,131 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,654 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,697 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,133 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,860 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,576 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,400 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,351 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,984 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,590 |
| 1969 | 7 | #3,805 | 12 | #4,321 |
| 1968 | 6 | #3,968 | 10 | #4,653 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,388 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,709 |
| 1965 | 6 | #3,773 | 11 | #4,092 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,447 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,269 |
| 1962 | 7 | #3,516 | 16 | #3,235 |
| 1961 | 5 | #4,427 | 27 | #2,335 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,459 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,825 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,622 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,390 |
| 1956 | 5 | #4,258 | 26 | #2,178 |
| 1955 | 6 | #3,733 | 19 | #2,598 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,691 |
| 1953 | 5 | #4,135 | 23 | #2,216 |
| 1952 | 9 | #2,802 | 20 | #2,376 |
| 1951 | 10 | #2,588 | 28 | #1,863 |
| 1950 | 5 | #3,993 | 36 | #1,563 |
| 1949 | 12 | #2,293 | 24 | #1,992 |
| 1948 | 8 | #2,930 | 23 | #2,051 |
| 1947 | 11 | #2,451 | 34 | #1,651 |
| 1946 | 17 | #1,792 | 22 | #1,999 |
| 1945 | 5 | #3,588 | 17 | #2,116 |
| 1944 | 5 | #3,723 | 23 | #1,777 |
| 1943 | 10 | #2,494 | 26 | #1,688 |
| 1942 | 7 | #3,098 | 24 | #1,741 |
| 1941 | 16 | #1,797 | 25 | #1,591 |
| 1940 | 8 | #2,784 | 25 | #1,570 |
| 1939 | 7 | #3,009 | 39 | #1,171 |
| 1938 | 5 | #3,830 | 27 | #1,462 |
| 1937 | 9 | #2,606 | 34 | #1,243 |
| 1936 | 11 | #2,251 | 48 | #998 |
| 1935 | 14 | #1,998 | 64 | #863 |
| 1934 | 16 | #1,825 | 33 | #1,249 |
| 1933 | 11 | #2,309 | 28 | #1,387 |
| 1932 | 11 | #2,405 | 27 | #1,470 |
| 1931 | 22 | #1,518 | 45 | #1,050 |
| 1930 | 11 | #2,546 | 42 | #1,149 |
| 1929 | 14 | #2,155 | 39 | #1,206 |
| 1928 | 11 | #2,585 | 49 | #1,076 |
| 1927 | 13 | #2,363 | 35 | #1,377 |
| 1926 | 15 | #2,149 | 48 | #1,090 |
| 1925 | 20 | #1,780 | 32 | #1,457 |
| 1924 | 19 | #1,874 | 45 | #1,178 |
| 1923 | 22 | #1,677 | 37 | #1,295 |
| 1922 | 15 | #2,197 | 31 | #1,488 |
| 1921 | 16 | #2,116 | 26 | #1,703 |
| 1920 | 20 | #1,795 | 24 | #1,729 |
| 1919 | 16 | #2,029 | 20 | #1,891 |
| 1918 | 13 | #2,341 | 41 | #1,175 |
| 1917 | 13 | #2,239 | 19 | #1,880 |
| 1916 | 12 | #2,342 | 24 | #1,561 |
| 1915 | 18 | #1,695 | 20 | #1,714 |
| 1914 | 11 | #2,055 | 18 | #1,580 |
| 1913 | 11 | #1,758 | 5 | #3,470 |
| 1912 | 10 | #1,693 | 8 | #2,262 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,303 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,499 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,950 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Loris reached #1,518 in 1931. As a girl name, it reached #863 in 1935. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1930s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Loris
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.