Is Roxie a boy or girl name?
Roxie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 48 girls and 0 boys were named Roxie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 98.9% of the 18,577 US babies named Roxie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,314
- Babies named Roxie since 1880
- 18,577
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 319 babies
Boys and girls named Roxie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 933 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 1,396 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 1,711 | 100% |
| 1910s | 43 | 2,447 | 98.3% |
| 1920s | 66 | 2,318 | 97.2% |
| 1930s | 18 | 1,750 | 99% |
| 1940s | 42 | 1,986 | 97.9% |
| 1950s | 29 | 2,228 | 98.7% |
| 1960s | 5 | 1,156 | 99.6% |
| 1970s | 0 | 544 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 484 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 256 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 366 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 595 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 204 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,314 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,971 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,692 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,598 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,483 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,440 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,041 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,470 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,215 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 56 | #3,049 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,106 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 70 | #2,561 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 70 | #2,591 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 90 | #2,138 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,932 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,449 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,916 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,852 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,147 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,859 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,921 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,786 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,595 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,974 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,500 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 13 | #7,623 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,021 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,219 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,159 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,544 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,981 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,403 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,652 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,981 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 49 | #2,484 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,600 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,816 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,187 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,048 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,128 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,138 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,583 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,629 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,078 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,090 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,868 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,984 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,020 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,091 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,799 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,640 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,824 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,800 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,511 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,367 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,240 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 89 | #1,143 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,251 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,238 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 117 | #948 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 129 | #927 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 129 | #932 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 143 | #884 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 170 | #803 |
| 1960 | 5 | #4,506 | 147 | #857 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 188 | #741 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 149 | #836 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 194 | #718 |
| 1956 | 5 | #4,376 | 259 | #587 |
| 1955 | 7 | #3,454 | 247 | #584 |
| 1954 | 8 | #3,132 | 269 | #542 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 242 | #564 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 237 | #564 |
| 1951 | 9 | #2,820 | 234 | #551 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 209 | #580 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 213 | #576 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 208 | #582 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 212 | #586 |
| 1946 | 7 | #3,129 | 200 | #562 |
| 1945 | 5 | #3,701 | 186 | #533 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 204 | #505 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 214 | #511 |
| 1942 | 6 | #3,508 | 203 | #522 |
| 1941 | 13 | #2,071 | 162 | #551 |
| 1940 | 11 | #2,296 | 184 | #512 |
| 1939 | 6 | #3,428 | 183 | #494 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 164 | #531 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 169 | #506 |
| 1936 | 6 | #3,481 | 159 | #518 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 162 | #501 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 196 | #462 |
| 1933 | 6 | #3,575 | 166 | #496 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 190 | #481 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 178 | #483 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 183 | #494 |
| 1929 | 6 | #3,888 | 160 | #537 |
| 1928 | 6 | #4,076 | 197 | #490 |
| 1927 | 8 | #3,399 | 178 | #533 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 217 | #469 |
| 1925 | 7 | #3,681 | 260 | #427 |
| 1924 | 10 | #2,986 | 278 | #417 |
| 1923 | 5 | #4,782 | 211 | #475 |
| 1922 | 11 | #2,772 | 278 | #395 |
| 1921 | 7 | #3,809 | 257 | #423 |
| 1920 | 6 | #4,199 | 282 | #394 |
| 1919 | 8 | #3,335 | 305 | #371 |
| 1918 | 10 | #2,850 | 309 | #369 |
| 1917 | 5 | #4,469 | 265 | #389 |
| 1916 | 6 | #3,818 | 277 | #376 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 301 | #341 |
| 1914 | 9 | #2,422 | 237 | #344 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 212 | #331 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 204 | #320 |
| 1911 | 5 | #1,954 | 168 | #308 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 169 | #298 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 159 | #286 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 162 | #279 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 178 | #259 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 165 | #254 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 174 | #241 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 153 | #255 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 163 | #234 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 170 | #232 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 179 | #216 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 208 | #215 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 151 | #222 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 171 | #224 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 144 | #232 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 132 | #242 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 141 | #231 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 127 | #241 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 127 | #234 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 148 | #210 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 120 | #220 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 135 | #206 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 125 | #206 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 136 | #192 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 111 | #190 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 92 | #206 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 88 | #203 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 100 | #178 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 75 | #200 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 72 | #196 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 72 | #179 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 62 | #196 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Roxie reached #1,954 in 1911. As a girl name, it reached #178 in 1884. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.