Is Zenobia a boy or girl name?
Zenobia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 31 girls and 0 boys were named Zenobia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 4,573 US babies named Zenobia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #4,541
- Babies named Zenobia since 1881
- 4,573
- Most popular year
- 1923
- 62 babies
Boys and girls named Zenobia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 43 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 93 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 159 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 401 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 497 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 342 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 351 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 426 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 371 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 368 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 335 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 335 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 277 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 392 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 183 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,541 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,757 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,374 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,410 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,398 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,005 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,673 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,918 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,376 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,701 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 55 | #3,078 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,074 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,265 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,144 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,901 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,336 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,877 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 27 | #5,374 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,460 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,263 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,818 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,793 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,379 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,208 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,788 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,086 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,139 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,546 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,568 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,421 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,371 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,351 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,678 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,206 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,570 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,252 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,164 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,098 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,722 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,937 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,850 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,430 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,769 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,060 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,001 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,476 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,858 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,714 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,134 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,905 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,615 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,222 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,221 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,106 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,041 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,979 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,203 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,751 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,765 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,800 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,891 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,249 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,413 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,836 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,886 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,671 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,762 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,550 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,661 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,497 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,738 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,706 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,538 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,504 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,258 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,303 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,575 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,509 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,558 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,873 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,432 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,525 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,161 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,608 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,271 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,052 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,230 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,280 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,295 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,330 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,517 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,310 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,319 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,501 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,058 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,002 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,289 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,260 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,242 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 60 | #969 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,085 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 62 | #940 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,007 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,034 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,170 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 58 | #932 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,060 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,001 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,042 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 47 | #978 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 39 | #955 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 33 | #945 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 37 | #831 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 25 | #874 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,029 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 35 | #683 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 25 | #790 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,381 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 20 | #844 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,010 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,169 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,589 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 17 | #871 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,336 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,228 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,033 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 15 | #919 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,550 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,046 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,200 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,133 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,020 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 13 | #860 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,005 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 9 | #948 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 10 | #777 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,045 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,052 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 7 | #811 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 6 | #828 |
Highest rank
Zenobia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #683 in 1909. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.