Is Winford a boy or girl name?
Winford was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 4,503 US babies named Winford were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Winford since 1889
- 4,503
- Most popular year
- 1928
- 116 babies
Boys and girls named Winford, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 22 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 41 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 478 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,024 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 867 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 745 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 589 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 372 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 180 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 120 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 53 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 6 | #12,412 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 7 | #8,441 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 9 | #6,392 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 12 | #4,990 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 11 | #5,224 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 7 | #7,238 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 7 | #7,154 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 11 | #4,804 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 8 | #5,733 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 11 | #4,231 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 9 | #4,840 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 13 | #3,586 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 12 | #3,691 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 14 | #3,227 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 20 | #2,517 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 10 | #4,143 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 12 | #3,606 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 12 | #3,561 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 19 | #2,472 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 11 | #3,598 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 12 | #3,259 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 22 | #2,131 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 11 | #3,315 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 17 | #2,403 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 14 | #2,657 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 31 | #1,595 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 31 | #1,545 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 21 | #1,859 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 32 | #1,392 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 27 | #1,506 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 40 | #1,193 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 32 | #1,384 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 29 | #1,486 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 33 | #1,373 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 51 | #1,080 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 54 | #1,068 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 53 | #1,070 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 62 | #986 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 57 | #1,018 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 41 | #1,233 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 56 | #1,007 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 61 | #970 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 57 | #994 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 67 | #883 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 67 | #862 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 59 | #918 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 62 | #877 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 69 | #823 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 60 | #889 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 79 | #777 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 71 | #792 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 61 | #797 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 69 | #753 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 82 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 83 | #704 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 95 | #623 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 76 | #696 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 75 | #690 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 74 | #714 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 80 | #670 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 98 | #585 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 91 | #617 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 89 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 81 | #649 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 96 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 86 | #642 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 97 | #628 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 91 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 116 | #576 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 108 | #600 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 99 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 108 | #610 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 107 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 110 | #608 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 89 | #696 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 98 | #655 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 98 | #639 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 89 | #656 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 89 | #657 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 61 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 63 | #780 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 61 | #775 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 31 | #1,016 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 34 | #833 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 27 | #875 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 12 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 11 | #1,044 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 7 | #1,272 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 8 | #1,112 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 6 | #1,343 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 5 | #1,315 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 9 | #778 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 6 | #1,305 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 5 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 5 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 7 | #974 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 5 | #1,124 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 6 | #972 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Winford reached #576 in 1928. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Winford
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.