Is Crawford a boy or girl name?
Crawford is mostly a boy name in the US. In 2024, 7 girls and 52 boys were named Crawford, so 11.9% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 1% of the 4,688 US babies named Crawford were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,557
- Girl rank, 2024
- #12,407
- Babies named Crawford since 1880
- 4,688
- Most popular year
- 1924
- 88 babies
Boys and girls named Crawford, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 114 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 118 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 147 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 551 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 643 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 459 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 436 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 405 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 265 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 148 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 156 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 179 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 227 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 512 | 19 | 3.6% |
| 2020s | 280 | 29 | 9.4% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 52 | #2,557 | 7 | #12,407 |
| 2023 | 52 | #2,547 | 8 | #11,403 |
| 2022 | 63 | #2,273 | 8 | #11,431 |
| 2021 | 54 | #2,468 | 6 | #13,872 |
| 2020 | 59 | #2,297 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 69 | #2,092 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 70 | #2,050 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 51 | #2,496 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 57 | #2,307 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 63 | #2,172 | 6 | #14,919 |
| 2014 | 61 | #2,211 | 6 | #14,993 |
| 2013 | 36 | #3,067 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 42 | #2,826 | 7 | #13,816 |
| 2011 | 33 | #3,320 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 30 | #3,551 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 22 | #4,457 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 33 | #3,356 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 27 | #3,804 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 19 | #4,712 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 18 | #4,666 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 31 | #3,169 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 27 | #3,375 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 12 | #5,795 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 18 | #4,331 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 20 | #3,940 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 29 | #2,876 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 19 | #3,730 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 20 | #3,479 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 24 | #3,041 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 12 | #4,850 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 15 | #4,122 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 14 | #4,261 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 15 | #3,952 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 13 | #4,273 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 18 | #3,335 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 19 | #3,114 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 11 | #4,225 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 18 | #2,861 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 16 | #3,024 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 10 | #4,106 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 21 | #2,378 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 15 | #2,946 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 13 | #3,324 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 18 | #2,593 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 15 | #2,986 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 14 | #3,038 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 10 | #3,651 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 14 | #2,936 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 12 | #3,128 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 16 | #2,555 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 16 | #2,481 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 20 | #2,055 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 14 | #2,557 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 17 | #2,301 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 15 | #2,417 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 18 | #1,993 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 17 | #1,974 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 21 | #1,717 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 28 | #1,457 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 25 | #1,567 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 21 | #1,747 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 30 | #1,430 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 35 | #1,317 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 35 | #1,352 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 35 | #1,343 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 27 | #1,523 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 40 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 32 | #1,394 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 31 | #1,392 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 38 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 56 | #997 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 30 | #1,381 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 41 | #1,154 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 55 | #944 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 55 | #927 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 50 | #985 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 46 | #1,038 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 40 | #1,151 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 36 | #1,159 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 36 | #1,088 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 49 | #908 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 35 | #1,157 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 44 | #1,011 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 46 | #940 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 54 | #859 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 35 | #1,089 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 33 | #1,131 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 39 | #1,022 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 36 | #1,074 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 41 | #997 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 41 | #1,010 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 55 | #837 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 48 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 58 | #827 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 73 | #744 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 63 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 50 | #965 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 54 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 55 | #904 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 62 | #845 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 88 | #697 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 64 | #848 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 68 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 77 | #761 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 62 | #865 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 79 | #706 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 82 | #693 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 84 | #652 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 66 | #753 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 66 | #736 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 50 | #746 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 42 | #715 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 36 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 26 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 20 | #660 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 12 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 19 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 12 | #781 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 13 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 20 | #509 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 15 | #591 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 8 | #857 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 11 | #697 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 14 | #539 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 23 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 9 | #729 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 14 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 12 | #623 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 20 | #443 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 11 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 11 | #640 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 12 | #580 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 13 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 16 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 11 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 11 | #621 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 14 | #465 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 15 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 8 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 10 | #622 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 10 | #608 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 15 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 12 | #509 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 8 | #695 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Crawford reached #443 in 1896. As a girl name, it reached #11,403 in 2023. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Crawford
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.