Is Lura a boy or girl name?
Lura was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 9,555 US babies named Lura were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #10,720
- Babies named Lura since 1880
- 9,555
- Most popular year
- 1917
- 230 babies
Boys and girls named Lura, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 727 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 948 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 920 | 100% |
| 1910s | 5 | 1,553 | 99.7% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,629 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 962 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 789 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 626 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 470 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 283 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 252 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 154 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 98 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 93 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 46 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,720 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,642 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,317 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,304 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,711 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,016 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,416 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,117 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,433 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,484 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,315 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,706 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,855 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,852 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 10 | #11,161 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,607 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,351 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,464 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,620 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,837 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,612 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,611 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,115 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 5 | #15,840 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,830 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,392 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,247 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,136 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,922 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,477 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,623 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,921 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,612 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,379 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,972 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,137 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,021 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,793 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,112 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,297 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,989 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,826 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,461 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,617 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,607 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,644 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,242 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,351 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,175 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,996 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,866 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,777 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,066 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,824 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,963 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,802 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,174 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,788 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,454 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,677 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,451 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,590 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,497 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,491 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,404 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,565 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,264 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,193 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,402 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,234 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,177 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,107 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,049 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 82 | #999 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,004 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 103 | #864 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 98 | #835 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 80 | #847 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,044 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 70 | #940 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 75 | #910 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 64 | #921 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 84 | #766 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 73 | #808 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 85 | #753 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 81 | #759 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 74 | #789 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 103 | #643 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 99 | #674 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 82 | #729 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 116 | #615 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 124 | #594 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 125 | #619 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 118 | #642 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 122 | #640 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 162 | #557 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 141 | #597 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 169 | #553 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 175 | #552 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 177 | #537 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 193 | #501 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 184 | #521 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 188 | #508 |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,552 | 195 | #478 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 200 | #477 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 230 | #419 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 184 | #469 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 178 | #462 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 156 | #438 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 97 | #518 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 118 | #434 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 100 | #404 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 95 | #404 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 100 | #366 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 97 | #367 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 87 | #381 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 82 | #379 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 98 | #345 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 93 | #337 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 87 | #337 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 107 | #307 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 82 | #339 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 87 | #361 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 82 | #331 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 90 | #332 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 82 | #324 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 94 | #301 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 93 | #300 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 109 | #262 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 103 | #265 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 83 | #297 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 102 | #240 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 110 | #232 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 100 | #233 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 91 | #245 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 87 | #223 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 77 | #233 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 88 | #202 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 73 | #225 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 65 | #224 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 47 | #255 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 46 | #232 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 53 | #212 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lura reached #4,552 in 1919. As a girl name, it reached #202 in 1885. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.