Is Omer a boy or girl name?
Omer is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 71 boys were named Omer, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.8% of the 8,851 US babies named Omer were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,105
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Omer since 1880
- 8,851
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 239 babies
Boys and girls named Omer, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 270 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 294 | 5 | 1.7% |
| 1900s | 254 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 1,382 | 16 | 1.1% |
| 1920s | 1,786 | 30 | 1.7% |
| 1930s | 964 | 5 | 0.5% |
| 1940s | 620 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 383 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 232 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 197 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 276 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 441 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 604 | 5 | 0.8% |
| 2010s | 749 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 332 | 6 | 1.8% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 71 | #2,105 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 64 | #2,236 | 6 | #14,712 |
| 2022 | 72 | #2,091 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 54 | #2,481 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 71 | #2,013 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 80 | #1,883 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 92 | #1,713 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 74 | #1,952 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 82 | #1,840 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 75 | #1,945 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 70 | #2,036 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 85 | #1,728 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 59 | #2,229 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 60 | #2,193 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 72 | #1,950 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 54 | #2,395 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 70 | #2,022 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 54 | #2,405 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 74 | #1,852 | 5 | #19,300 |
| 2005 | 59 | #2,103 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 64 | #1,925 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 57 | #2,024 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 62 | #1,843 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 55 | #1,972 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 55 | #1,913 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 48 | #2,015 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 66 | #1,595 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 53 | #1,806 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 49 | #1,864 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 44 | #1,944 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 47 | #1,847 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 39 | #2,076 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 35 | #2,203 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 31 | #2,336 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 29 | #2,416 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 29 | #2,339 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 28 | #2,233 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 36 | #1,824 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 23 | #2,405 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 23 | #2,340 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 31 | #1,826 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 27 | #2,001 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 24 | #2,195 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 23 | #2,252 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 32 | #1,792 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 25 | #2,085 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 22 | #2,182 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 18 | #2,533 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 17 | #2,578 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 19 | #2,340 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 23 | #1,964 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 20 | #2,104 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 19 | #2,135 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 20 | #2,102 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 14 | #2,600 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 19 | #1,960 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 20 | #1,818 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 14 | #2,226 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 25 | #1,568 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 13 | #2,342 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 26 | #1,564 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 21 | #1,776 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 26 | #1,578 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 37 | #1,316 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 31 | #1,456 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 32 | #1,404 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 38 | #1,260 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 31 | #1,429 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 38 | #1,248 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 29 | #1,443 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 45 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 42 | #1,152 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 40 | #1,180 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 39 | #1,165 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 49 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 45 | #1,059 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 49 | #1,012 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 71 | #829 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 49 | #960 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 54 | #859 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 53 | #876 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 72 | #772 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 73 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 84 | #668 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 70 | #736 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 74 | #693 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 79 | #681 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 76 | #690 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 76 | #683 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 92 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 93 | #621 | 5 | #4,804 |
| 1933 | 99 | #586 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 122 | #529 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 117 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 136 | #514 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 143 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 144 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 157 | #483 | 7 | #4,172 |
| 1926 | 165 | #469 | 6 | #4,704 |
| 1925 | 173 | #460 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 181 | #456 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 190 | #442 | 10 | #3,302 |
| 1922 | 226 | #402 | 7 | #4,334 |
| 1921 | 217 | #412 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 190 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 199 | #415 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 234 | #392 | 5 | #5,391 |
| 1917 | 171 | #434 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 176 | #426 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 189 | #392 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 146 | #393 | 6 | #3,504 |
| 1913 | 110 | #412 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 89 | #414 | 5 | #3,320 |
| 1911 | 30 | #557 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 38 | #450 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 24 | #541 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 39 | #372 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 35 | #383 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 23 | #470 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 18 | #564 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 20 | #487 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 22 | #443 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 31 | #357 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 21 | #419 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 21 | #526 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 24 | #381 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 34 | #332 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 22 | #406 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 38 | #305 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 26 | #379 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 24 | #384 | 5 | #1,653 |
| 1893 | 31 | #315 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 23 | #402 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 38 | #263 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 34 | #298 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 27 | #345 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 29 | #345 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 22 | #353 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 36 | #286 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 18 | #433 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 32 | #310 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 23 | #352 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 30 | #315 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 24 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 29 | #316 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Omer reached #263 in 1891. As a girl name, it reached #1,653 in 1894. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Omer
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.