Is Newton a boy or girl name?
Newton is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 28 boys were named Newton, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 8,167 US babies named Newton were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,945
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Newton since 1880
- 8,167
- Most popular year
- 1919
- 208 babies
Boys and girls named Newton, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 538 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 372 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 316 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 1,306 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,552 | 5 | 0.3% |
| 1930s | 982 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 801 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 613 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 398 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 285 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 218 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 232 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 184 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 232 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 133 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28 | #3,945 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 25 | #4,298 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 27 | #4,059 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 26 | #4,092 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 27 | #3,888 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 31 | #3,612 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 37 | #3,149 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 28 | #3,862 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 17 | #5,480 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 26 | #4,045 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 21 | #4,654 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 24 | #4,144 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 15 | #5,901 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 15 | #5,867 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 18 | #5,180 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 25 | #4,132 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 21 | #4,658 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 27 | #3,864 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 20 | #4,634 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 20 | #4,415 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 14 | #5,706 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 16 | #4,974 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 15 | #5,071 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 8 | #8,087 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 18 | #4,326 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 23 | #3,456 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 15 | #4,577 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 19 | #3,693 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 20 | #3,513 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 21 | #3,272 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 38 | #2,162 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 24 | #2,919 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 25 | #2,796 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 29 | #2,449 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 18 | #3,416 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 20 | #3,056 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 20 | #2,825 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 20 | #2,688 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 30 | #1,993 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 20 | #2,570 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 24 | #2,216 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 15 | #3,025 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 22 | #2,316 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 28 | #1,977 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 19 | #2,591 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 27 | #1,984 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 22 | #2,179 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 22 | #2,185 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 25 | #1,975 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 25 | #1,927 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 27 | #1,776 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 31 | #1,574 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 38 | #1,382 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 36 | #1,430 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 32 | #1,512 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 34 | #1,389 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 31 | #1,416 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 37 | #1,246 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 32 | #1,360 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 39 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 43 | #1,184 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 40 | #1,235 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 46 | #1,143 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 45 | #1,195 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 51 | #1,093 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 52 | #1,078 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 47 | #1,124 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 63 | #961 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 54 | #1,027 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 74 | #861 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 63 | #937 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 53 | #996 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 58 | #935 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 71 | #834 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 78 | #775 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 56 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 85 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 80 | #770 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 80 | #737 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 67 | #752 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 82 | #692 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 94 | #665 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 108 | #608 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 83 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 66 | #767 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 89 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 83 | #659 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 96 | #591 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 78 | #672 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 90 | #623 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 99 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 110 | #548 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 116 | #547 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 122 | #526 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 99 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 117 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 145 | #503 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 141 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 144 | #507 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 152 | #492 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 169 | #476 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 156 | #492 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 169 | #476 | 5 | #5,575 |
| 1921 | 169 | #472 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 190 | #438 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 208 | #404 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 203 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 170 | #436 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 192 | #400 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 143 | #460 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 118 | #444 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 103 | #425 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 86 | #422 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 43 | #450 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 40 | #436 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 23 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 29 | #461 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 34 | #387 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 33 | #373 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 32 | #368 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 19 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 27 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 39 | #311 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 30 | #331 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 50 | #293 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 34 | #303 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 29 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 35 | #315 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 34 | #328 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 33 | #325 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 32 | #315 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 47 | #257 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 46 | #265 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 36 | #272 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 46 | #251 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 36 | #283 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 50 | #249 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 41 | #248 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 66 | #203 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 61 | #203 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 41 | #267 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 59 | #197 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 61 | #209 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 53 | #210 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 70 | #182 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Newton reached #182 in 1880. As a girl name, it reached #5,575 in 1922. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Newton
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.