Is Mose a boy or girl name?
Mose is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 13 boys were named Mose, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.7% of the 7,960 US babies named Mose were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #6,683
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Mose since 1880
- 7,960
- Most popular year
- 1919
- 168 babies
Boys and girls named Mose, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 618 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 555 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 601 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 1,153 | 11 | 0.9% |
| 1920s | 1,175 | 13 | 1.1% |
| 1930s | 824 | 20 | 2.4% |
| 1940s | 818 | 11 | 1.3% |
| 1950s | 646 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 405 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 262 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 214 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 203 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 166 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 181 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 84 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13 | #6,683 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 22 | #4,691 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 18 | #5,357 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 15 | #5,939 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 16 | #5,616 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 24 | #4,299 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 19 | #5,045 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 16 | #5,705 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 14 | #6,239 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 13 | #6,577 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 23 | #4,347 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 21 | #4,564 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 20 | #4,807 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 18 | #5,125 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 13 | #6,597 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 15 | #5,996 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 18 | #5,193 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 12 | #6,945 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 20 | #4,632 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 16 | #5,198 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 16 | #5,177 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 18 | #4,560 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 19 | #4,282 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 18 | #4,409 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 14 | #5,231 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 14 | #4,940 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 15 | #4,568 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 24 | #3,126 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 23 | #3,173 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 18 | #3,655 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 17 | #3,852 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 14 | #4,381 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 16 | #3,863 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 33 | #2,213 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 29 | #2,414 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 16 | #3,561 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 21 | #2,739 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 19 | #2,795 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 24 | #2,340 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 20 | #2,568 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 18 | #2,671 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 18 | #2,638 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 26 | #2,094 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 26 | #2,073 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 26 | #2,096 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 24 | #2,139 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 25 | #2,001 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 24 | #2,042 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 32 | #1,668 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 20 | #2,265 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 25 | #1,872 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 14 | #2,678 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 38 | #1,380 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 33 | #1,510 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 27 | #1,686 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 40 | #1,260 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 44 | #1,141 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 48 | #1,067 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 33 | #1,340 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 29 | #1,449 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 36 | #1,324 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 48 | #1,112 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 49 | #1,103 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 34 | #1,381 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 44 | #1,186 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 50 | #1,096 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 55 | #1,033 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 47 | #1,123 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 49 | #1,089 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 57 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 55 | #1,016 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 65 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 91 | #741 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 93 | #723 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 84 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 73 | #807 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 86 | #727 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 75 | #797 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 84 | #715 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 88 | #647 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 88 | #663 | 6 | #4,401 |
| 1943 | 72 | #771 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 106 | #614 | 5 | #5,149 |
| 1941 | 67 | #761 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 79 | #683 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 64 | #760 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 90 | #630 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 66 | #754 | 6 | #4,126 |
| 1936 | 63 | #772 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 78 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 75 | #707 | 8 | #3,375 |
| 1933 | 92 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 111 | #563 | 6 | #4,270 |
| 1931 | 82 | #663 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 103 | #604 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 97 | #617 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 118 | #564 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 129 | #547 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 104 | #616 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 100 | #637 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 114 | #597 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 97 | #653 | 8 | #3,867 |
| 1922 | 144 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 150 | #507 | 5 | #5,656 |
| 1920 | 122 | #563 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 168 | #453 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 152 | #484 | 6 | #4,656 |
| 1917 | 114 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 138 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 128 | #491 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 112 | #453 | 5 | #4,026 |
| 1913 | 91 | #454 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 99 | #387 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 80 | #297 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 71 | #295 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 63 | #284 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 65 | #263 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 56 | #283 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 48 | #295 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 58 | #262 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 70 | #225 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 58 | #243 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 59 | #240 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 49 | #248 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 75 | #233 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 59 | #222 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 44 | #272 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 43 | #275 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 45 | #275 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 62 | #222 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 59 | #223 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 63 | #218 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 68 | #215 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 55 | #216 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 57 | #220 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 57 | #221 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 62 | #224 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 55 | #209 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 69 | #197 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 50 | #235 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 68 | #197 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 65 | #183 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 77 | #176 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 63 | #184 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 52 | #231 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Mose reached #176 in 1882. As a girl name, it reached #3,375 in 1934. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Mose
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.