Is Ellsworth a boy or girl name?
Ellsworth was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 7,332 US babies named Ellsworth were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Ellsworth since 1880
- 7,332
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 300 babies
Boys and girls named Ellsworth, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 176 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 260 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 322 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 1,908 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 2,115 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 1,045 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 658 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 399 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 208 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 100 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 67 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 21 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 32 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 11 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 11 | #7,155 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 6 | #11,177 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 9 | #8,342 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 6 | #11,126 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 6 | #11,136 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 5 | #12,829 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 5 | #13,038 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 5 | #10,905 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 7 | #6,905 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 7 | #6,738 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 7 | #6,636 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 5 | #7,300 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 5 | #7,048 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 11 | #3,874 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 7 | #5,136 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 13 | #3,348 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 14 | #3,087 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 12 | #3,476 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 8 | #4,543 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 18 | #2,506 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 9 | #3,935 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 7 | #4,466 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 12 | #3,004 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 10 | #3,281 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 12 | #2,874 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 13 | #2,723 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 11 | #2,949 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 14 | #2,345 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 22 | #1,707 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 16 | #1,989 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 11 | #2,523 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 22 | #1,685 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 14 | #2,242 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 18 | #1,917 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 18 | #1,912 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 39 | #1,267 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 34 | #1,368 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 22 | #1,732 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 26 | #1,538 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 41 | #1,225 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 32 | #1,366 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 40 | #1,189 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 36 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 54 | #981 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 46 | #1,071 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 48 | #1,028 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 54 | #938 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 38 | #1,150 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 61 | #873 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 67 | #847 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 70 | #794 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 59 | #811 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 71 | #739 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 82 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 67 | #786 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 75 | #714 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 68 | #744 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 89 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 89 | #635 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 95 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 106 | #558 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 103 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 97 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 110 | #546 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 114 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 118 | #536 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 124 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 167 | #457 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 160 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 183 | #451 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 197 | #433 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 218 | #407 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 215 | #417 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 236 | #387 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 218 | #409 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 276 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 245 | #381 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 231 | #384 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 300 | #330 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 270 | #331 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 252 | #337 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 259 | #328 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 219 | #305 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 137 | #353 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 138 | #313 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 58 | #365 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 44 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 43 | #360 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 44 | #341 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 37 | #366 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 37 | #342 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 31 | #372 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 36 | #337 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 19 | #489 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 26 | #392 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 22 | #399 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 27 | #436 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 30 | #326 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 21 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 28 | #356 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 31 | #342 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 37 | #296 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 32 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 16 | #466 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 28 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 15 | #459 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 22 | #377 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 17 | #448 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 25 | #371 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 16 | #426 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 12 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 16 | #466 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 12 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 30 | #300 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 22 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 15 | #446 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 11 | #581 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Ellsworth reached #296 in 1895. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.