Is Ona a boy or girl name?
Ona is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 29 girls and 0 boys were named Ona, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 98.9% of the 8,009 US babies named Ona were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #4,732
- Babies named Ona since 1880
- 8,009
- Most popular year
- 1917
- 191 babies
Boys and girls named Ona, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | 362 | 98.6% |
| 1890s | 0 | 681 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 735 | 100% |
| 1910s | 50 | 1,384 | 96.5% |
| 1920s | 32 | 1,448 | 97.8% |
| 1930s | 5 | 920 | 99.5% |
| 1940s | 0 | 601 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 451 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 250 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 232 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 145 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 128 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 147 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 300 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 133 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,732 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,838 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,872 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,060 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,610 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,831 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,057 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,780 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,214 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,903 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,430 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,418 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,849 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,023 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,145 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,976 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,326 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,331 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 10 | #11,219 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,070 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,018 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,816 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,688 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,784 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 13 | #7,923 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,112 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,993 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 7 | #11,752 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,364 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,175 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,910 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,353 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,883 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,591 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,004 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 6 | #11,895 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,520 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,845 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,487 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,800 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,900 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,097 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,984 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,116 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,100 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,166 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,354 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,873 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,524 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,549 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,065 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,548 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,805 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,851 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,835 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,167 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,769 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,538 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,440 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,284 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,345 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,405 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,398 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,397 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,849 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,574 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,013 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,674 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,676 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,531 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,362 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,612 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,278 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,131 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,269 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,287 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,591 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,390 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,046 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 65 | #965 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 66 | #961 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,015 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 79 | #871 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 64 | #923 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 68 | #867 |
| 1939 | 5 | #3,836 | 76 | #788 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 71 | #844 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 77 | #785 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 88 | #716 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 83 | #742 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 120 | #603 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 78 | #749 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 99 | #684 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 121 | #603 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 107 | #666 |
| 1929 | 9 | #2,911 | 131 | #597 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 113 | #659 |
| 1927 | 6 | #4,077 | 143 | #593 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 130 | #629 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 159 | #569 |
| 1924 | 6 | #4,216 | 157 | #590 |
| 1923 | 5 | #4,720 | 144 | #611 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 150 | #587 |
| 1921 | 6 | #4,207 | 160 | #571 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 161 | #566 |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,624 | 163 | #539 |
| 1918 | 11 | #2,657 | 169 | #543 |
| 1917 | 9 | #2,889 | 182 | #488 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 185 | #468 |
| 1915 | 12 | #2,265 | 168 | #476 |
| 1914 | 5 | #3,616 | 127 | #496 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 124 | #446 |
| 1912 | 8 | #2,005 | 97 | #488 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 75 | #480 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 94 | #409 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 68 | #455 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 83 | #402 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 85 | #386 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 68 | #413 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 76 | #387 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 73 | #390 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 54 | #433 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 74 | #372 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 79 | #345 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 75 | #386 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 75 | #345 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 76 | #360 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 71 | #350 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 63 | #367 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 66 | #348 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 64 | #347 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 82 | #303 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 65 | #331 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 63 | #318 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 56 | #346 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 53 | #344 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 58 | #316 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 47 | #313 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 45 | #316 |
| 1885 | 5 | #1,055 | 33 | #350 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 40 | #313 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 26 | #365 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 18 | #442 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 21 | #369 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 21 | #363 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Ona reached #1,055 in 1885. As a girl name, it reached #303 in 1893. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Ona
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.