Is Agatha a boy or girl name?
Agatha is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 128 girls and 0 boys were named Agatha, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 9,369 US babies named Agatha were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,618
- Babies named Agatha since 1880
- 9,369
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 218 babies
Boys and girls named Agatha, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 212 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 468 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 623 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 1,654 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,624 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 884 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 609 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 508 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 323 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 246 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 314 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 235 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 362 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 716 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 591 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,618 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 124 | #1,670 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,774 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 137 | #1,532 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 86 | #2,115 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 78 | #2,306 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,937 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 95 | #2,054 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 77 | #2,411 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 87 | #2,169 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 71 | #2,517 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,768 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,583 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,223 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,307 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,199 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 38 | #4,090 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,481 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,265 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 53 | #3,009 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,206 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,658 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,770 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,013 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,293 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,578 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,024 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,165 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,398 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,218 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,989 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,588 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,680 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,818 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,624 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,478 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,483 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,781 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,054 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,419 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,069 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,659 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,051 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,986 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,069 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,674 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,079 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,270 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,485 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,261 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,923 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,456 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,062 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,801 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,209 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,253 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,359 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,327 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,408 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,154 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,781 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,171 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,163 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,743 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,890 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,793 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,448 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,589 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,760 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,692 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,410 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,425 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,225 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,090 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,135 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,190 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,313 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,204 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,023 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 68 | #914 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,140 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,027 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,025 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 63 | #924 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 82 | #780 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 70 | #825 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 80 | #786 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 90 | #717 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 77 | #768 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 102 | #647 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 75 | #774 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 99 | #659 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 94 | #698 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 94 | #688 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 103 | #675 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 121 | #625 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 135 | #604 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 133 | #618 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 151 | #578 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 168 | #556 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 180 | #540 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 156 | #574 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 187 | #509 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 187 | #519 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 206 | #473 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 199 | #472 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 218 | #452 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 217 | #434 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 213 | #431 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 199 | #431 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 172 | #403 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 153 | #392 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 121 | #427 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 83 | #446 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 79 | #450 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 72 | #435 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 62 | #456 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 65 | #444 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 72 | #404 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 66 | #420 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 52 | #450 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 64 | #396 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 51 | #434 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 54 | #404 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 65 | #417 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 58 | #381 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 56 | #411 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 50 | #414 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 50 | #403 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 47 | #411 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 42 | #429 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 38 | #436 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 39 | #429 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 46 | #365 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 42 | #384 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 33 | #422 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 33 | #431 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 25 | #446 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 23 | #451 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 19 | #485 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 18 | #480 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 14 | #517 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 21 | #389 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 10 | #539 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 16 | #421 |
Highest rank
Agatha has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #365 in 1891. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Agatha
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.