Is Elda a boy or girl name?
Elda is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 18 girls and 0 boys were named Elda, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.5% of the 8,992 US babies named Elda were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #6,435
- Babies named Elda since 1880
- 8,992
- Most popular year
- 1916
- 255 babies
Boys and girls named Elda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 148 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 376 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 558 | 100% |
| 1910s | 16 | 1,791 | 99.1% |
| 1920s | 21 | 1,934 | 98.9% |
| 1930s | 5 | 1,019 | 99.5% |
| 1940s | 0 | 673 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 565 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 480 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 370 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 279 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 302 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 230 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 155 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 70 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,435 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,171 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,602 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,609 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,407 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,249 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,762 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,891 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,296 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,528 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,265 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,495 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,678 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,609 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,009 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,949 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 27 | #5,330 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,573 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,780 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,993 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,045 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,880 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,733 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,058 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,037 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,284 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,005 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,244 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,971 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,911 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,638 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,807 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,746 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,853 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,756 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,828 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,729 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,720 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,788 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,014 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,353 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,733 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,970 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,420 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,017 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,311 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,526 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,681 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,147 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,208 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,077 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,188 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,147 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,262 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,091 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,144 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,066 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,890 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,267 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,641 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,671 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,493 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,435 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,288 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,435 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,558 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,473 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,413 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,404 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,326 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,207 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,415 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,374 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,227 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,109 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,192 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,188 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,032 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 79 | #940 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,067 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 63 | #982 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 70 | #937 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 71 | #929 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 80 | #810 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 66 | #880 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 75 | #793 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 81 | #776 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 75 | #792 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 91 | #701 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 95 | #685 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 94 | #691 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 117 | #600 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 124 | #592 |
| 1931 | 5 | #3,934 | 112 | #626 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 155 | #546 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 156 | #547 |
| 1928 | 6 | #3,828 | 183 | #510 |
| 1927 | 5 | #4,371 | 164 | #553 |
| 1926 | 5 | #4,392 | 176 | #526 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 188 | #513 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 202 | #488 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 208 | #479 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 216 | #465 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 243 | #441 |
| 1920 | 5 | #4,490 | 198 | #489 |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,339 | 236 | #423 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 248 | #418 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 250 | #400 |
| 1916 | 5 | #4,094 | 250 | #396 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 241 | #389 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 155 | #440 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 143 | #412 |
| 1912 | 6 | #2,355 | 118 | #431 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 77 | #469 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 73 | #468 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 54 | #510 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 59 | #468 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 62 | #456 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 64 | #430 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 56 | #451 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 54 | #439 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 60 | #408 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 45 | #466 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 52 | #417 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 52 | #469 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 39 | #472 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 38 | #503 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 34 | #499 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 46 | #426 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 54 | #381 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 38 | #452 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 34 | #456 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 29 | #506 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 43 | #385 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 21 | #573 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 23 | #535 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 27 | #479 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 15 | #594 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 11 | #705 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 17 | #527 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 14 | #564 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 14 | #526 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 12 | #536 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 6 | #762 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 9 | #595 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Elda reached #2,355 in 1912. As a girl name, it reached #381 in 1895. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Elda
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.