Is Juliann a boy or girl name?
Juliann is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 12 girls and 0 boys were named Juliann, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99% of the 7,531 US babies named Juliann were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #8,652
- Babies named Juliann since 1900
- 7,531
- Most popular year
- 1961
- 163 babies
Boys and girls named Juliann, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 65 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 121 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 314 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 690 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,112 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,379 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 751 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 907 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 914 | 100% |
| 2000s | 5 | 793 | 99.4% |
| 2010s | 52 | 334 | 86.5% |
| 2020s | 21 | 62 | 74.7% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,652 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,069 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,324 |
| 2021 | 10 | #7,849 | 12 | #8,698 |
| 2020 | 11 | #7,242 | 11 | #9,216 |
| 2019 | 10 | #7,910 | 22 | #5,693 |
| 2018 | 9 | #8,476 | 20 | #6,137 |
| 2017 | 7 | #10,201 | 29 | #4,744 |
| 2016 | 7 | #10,192 | 28 | #4,914 |
| 2015 | 6 | #11,374 | 25 | #5,373 |
| 2014 | 7 | #10,159 | 42 | #3,685 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,953 |
| 2012 | 6 | #11,499 | 47 | #3,438 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,521 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,380 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,542 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,873 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 72 | #2,584 |
| 2006 | 5 | #12,984 | 65 | #2,744 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,986 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,693 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,937 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,925 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,720 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,565 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,659 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 123 | #1,397 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,700 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,953 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,063 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,721 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 68 | #2,038 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,502 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,477 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,598 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,408 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,322 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,242 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,463 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,194 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,383 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,407 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,573 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,773 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,713 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,784 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,713 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,984 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,010 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,679 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,357 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,516 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,252 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 103 | #1,134 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 154 | #869 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 120 | #987 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 127 | #919 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 124 | #921 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 130 | #881 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 144 | #829 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 142 | #870 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 143 | #879 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 152 | #857 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 163 | #825 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 134 | #915 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 120 | #963 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 131 | #895 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 123 | #929 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 126 | #889 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 120 | #892 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 102 | #962 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 102 | #937 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 105 | #903 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 90 | #984 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 93 | #925 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 98 | #893 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 94 | #899 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,081 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 72 | #992 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,242 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,035 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,056 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 75 | #909 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 72 | #858 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 53 | #984 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,153 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,083 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,077 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,106 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,429 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,197 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,873 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,652 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,571 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,984 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,981 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,971 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,388 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,523 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,550 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,742 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,658 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,430 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,853 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,728 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,133 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,486 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,146 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,614 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,527 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,429 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,933 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,830 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Juliann reached #7,242 in 2020. As a girl name, it reached #825 in 1961. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Juliann
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.