Is Natividad a boy or girl name?
Natividad was used for both boys and girls in close to equal numbers in the US. Across 1880–2024, 52.9% of the 3,653 US babies named Natividad were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Natividad since 1895
- 3,653
- Most popular year
- 1928
- 84 babies
Boys and girls named Natividad, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1900s | 5 | 41 | 89.1% |
| 1910s | 115 | 185 | 61.7% |
| 1920s | 299 | 332 | 52.6% |
| 1930s | 208 | 206 | 49.8% |
| 1940s | 222 | 169 | 43.2% |
| 1950s | 200 | 147 | 42.4% |
| 1960s | 155 | 144 | 48.2% |
| 1970s | 160 | 152 | 48.7% |
| 1980s | 148 | 145 | 49.5% |
| 1990s | 115 | 185 | 61.7% |
| 2000s | 81 | 145 | 64.2% |
| 2010s | 14 | 65 | 82.3% |
| 2020s | 0 | 10 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,029 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,955 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,060 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,392 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,524 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,859 |
| 2014 | 9 | #8,594 | 5 | #18,447 |
| 2013 | 5 | #13,464 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,221 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 8 | #13,034 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,596 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 9 | #12,171 |
| 2008 | 6 | #12,108 | 16 | #8,007 |
| 2007 | 9 | #8,703 | 13 | #9,396 |
| 2006 | 9 | #8,528 | 13 | #9,121 |
| 2005 | 10 | #7,491 | 22 | #5,735 |
| 2004 | 8 | #8,693 | 19 | #6,428 |
| 2003 | 9 | #7,655 | 9 | #11,062 |
| 2002 | 13 | #5,630 | 11 | #9,299 |
| 2001 | 8 | #8,082 | 22 | #5,321 |
| 2000 | 9 | #7,230 | 11 | #8,989 |
| 1999 | 6 | #9,529 | 20 | #5,369 |
| 1998 | 10 | #6,162 | 17 | #5,993 |
| 1997 | 10 | #5,960 | 19 | #5,354 |
| 1996 | 11 | #5,428 | 17 | #5,706 |
| 1995 | 17 | #3,801 | 21 | #4,799 |
| 1994 | 9 | #6,195 | 23 | #4,478 |
| 1993 | 6 | #8,363 | 14 | #6,506 |
| 1992 | 13 | #4,501 | 17 | #5,646 |
| 1991 | 21 | #3,076 | 20 | #4,940 |
| 1990 | 12 | #4,588 | 17 | #5,466 |
| 1989 | 10 | #5,068 | 16 | #5,473 |
| 1988 | 12 | #4,088 | 16 | #5,239 |
| 1987 | 15 | #3,291 | 15 | #5,241 |
| 1986 | 14 | #3,383 | 11 | #6,451 |
| 1985 | 19 | #2,670 | 17 | #4,585 |
| 1984 | 16 | #2,908 | 13 | #5,434 |
| 1983 | 12 | #3,557 | 13 | #5,350 |
| 1982 | 17 | #2,787 | 13 | #5,436 |
| 1981 | 15 | #2,991 | 11 | #6,190 |
| 1980 | 18 | #2,696 | 20 | #3,947 |
| 1979 | 14 | #3,116 | 10 | #6,533 |
| 1978 | 17 | #2,631 | 10 | #6,246 |
| 1977 | 19 | #2,430 | 25 | #3,143 |
| 1976 | 13 | #3,043 | 16 | #4,093 |
| 1975 | 14 | #2,863 | 23 | #3,123 |
| 1974 | 16 | #2,527 | 12 | #4,926 |
| 1973 | 16 | #2,472 | 9 | #5,895 |
| 1972 | 18 | #2,217 | 17 | #3,669 |
| 1971 | 15 | #2,517 | 14 | #4,248 |
| 1970 | 18 | #2,190 | 16 | #3,822 |
| 1969 | 19 | #1,958 | 16 | #3,565 |
| 1968 | 23 | #1,677 | 12 | #4,158 |
| 1967 | 11 | #2,573 | 16 | #3,288 |
| 1966 | 20 | #1,744 | 11 | #4,133 |
| 1965 | 16 | #2,049 | 23 | #2,589 |
| 1964 | 16 | #2,087 | 17 | #3,200 |
| 1963 | 12 | #2,499 | 9 | #4,793 |
| 1962 | 18 | #1,940 | 8 | #5,161 |
| 1961 | 10 | #2,836 | 14 | #3,556 |
| 1960 | 10 | #2,810 | 18 | #2,962 |
| 1959 | 25 | #1,613 | 22 | #2,499 |
| 1958 | 18 | #1,939 | 11 | #3,870 |
| 1957 | 23 | #1,706 | 14 | #3,256 |
| 1956 | 13 | #2,339 | 17 | #2,903 |
| 1955 | 19 | #1,833 | 14 | #3,188 |
| 1954 | 28 | #1,455 | 8 | #4,546 |
| 1953 | 13 | #2,255 | 19 | #2,486 |
| 1952 | 20 | #1,729 | 19 | #2,482 |
| 1951 | 23 | #1,585 | 10 | #3,649 |
| 1950 | 18 | #1,790 | 13 | #3,002 |
| 1949 | 34 | #1,247 | 13 | #2,957 |
| 1948 | 15 | #1,999 | 19 | #2,306 |
| 1947 | 27 | #1,440 | 15 | #2,736 |
| 1946 | 35 | #1,191 | 19 | #2,206 |
| 1945 | 19 | #1,563 | 10 | #3,069 |
| 1944 | 24 | #1,391 | 18 | #2,072 |
| 1943 | 12 | #2,250 | 15 | #2,415 |
| 1942 | 25 | #1,407 | 11 | #2,941 |
| 1941 | 12 | #2,167 | 22 | #1,732 |
| 1940 | 19 | #1,608 | 27 | #1,505 |
| 1939 | 13 | #2,024 | 16 | #2,102 |
| 1938 | 17 | #1,726 | 20 | #1,792 |
| 1937 | 14 | #1,967 | 18 | #1,897 |
| 1936 | 23 | #1,409 | 15 | #2,120 |
| 1935 | 18 | #1,695 | 13 | #2,403 |
| 1934 | 24 | #1,416 | 20 | #1,756 |
| 1933 | 23 | #1,442 | 24 | #1,538 |
| 1932 | 27 | #1,347 | 22 | #1,668 |
| 1931 | 21 | #1,576 | 32 | #1,308 |
| 1930 | 28 | #1,387 | 26 | #1,559 |
| 1929 | 33 | #1,232 | 26 | #1,546 |
| 1928 | 43 | #1,074 | 41 | #1,202 |
| 1927 | 29 | #1,395 | 34 | #1,398 |
| 1926 | 35 | #1,237 | 41 | #1,214 |
| 1925 | 35 | #1,217 | 41 | #1,220 |
| 1924 | 26 | #1,521 | 35 | #1,398 |
| 1923 | 25 | #1,537 | 33 | #1,421 |
| 1922 | 25 | #1,535 | 22 | #1,878 |
| 1921 | 26 | #1,500 | 35 | #1,362 |
| 1920 | 22 | #1,677 | 24 | #1,737 |
| 1919 | 17 | #1,943 | 34 | #1,342 |
| 1918 | 17 | #1,969 | 29 | #1,487 |
| 1917 | 20 | #1,678 | 26 | #1,497 |
| 1916 | 14 | #2,118 | 21 | #1,728 |
| 1915 | 14 | #2,040 | 24 | #1,510 |
| 1914 | 7 | #2,824 | 14 | #1,878 |
| 1913 | 6 | #2,700 | 18 | #1,392 |
| 1912 | 8 | #2,000 | 14 | #1,520 |
| 1911 | 6 | #1,678 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 6 | #1,532 | 5 | #2,681 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,449 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,512 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 5 | #1,369 | 5 | #2,147 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,859 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,084 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,989 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,613 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,749 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Natividad reached #1,074 in 1928. As a girl name, it reached #1,202 in 1928. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.