Is Rossie a boy or girl name?
Rossie was used for both, more often for girls in the US. Across 1880–2024, 70.2% of the 2,579 US babies named Rossie were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #13,153
- Babies named Rossie since 1883
- 2,579
- Most popular year
- 1919
- 90 babies
Boys and girls named Rossie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 77 | 100% |
| 1890s | 22 | 170 | 88.5% |
| 1900s | 35 | 199 | 85% |
| 1910s | 132 | 360 | 73.2% |
| 1920s | 139 | 340 | 71% |
| 1930s | 120 | 205 | 63.1% |
| 1940s | 108 | 136 | 55.7% |
| 1950s | 95 | 89 | 48.4% |
| 1960s | 65 | 44 | 40.4% |
| 1970s | 42 | 21 | 33.3% |
| 1980s | 5 | 45 | 90% |
| 1990s | 5 | 18 | 78.3% |
| 2000s | 0 | 25 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 47 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 35 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,153 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,123 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,283 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,169 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,929 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,502 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,540 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,444 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,704 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 5 | #18,600 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 5 | #18,684 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 6 | #16,156 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,872 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,931 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 5 | #18,598 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 5 | #18,236 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,830 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,129 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 5 | #15,604 |
| 1996 | 5 | #10,236 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 6 | #13,053 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 5 | #8,977 | 6 | #11,987 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,783 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,365 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,069 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,954 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,181 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,086 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,723 |
| 1979 | 5 | #6,880 | 8 | #7,865 |
| 1978 | 6 | #5,633 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 7 | #5,017 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 8 | #4,231 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 8 | #3,990 | 5 | #9,447 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 8 | #3,773 | 8 | #6,239 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 5 | #8,409 |
| 1968 | 9 | #3,063 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 6 | #3,901 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 12 | #2,438 | 6 | #6,417 |
| 1965 | 8 | #3,197 | 6 | #6,370 |
| 1964 | 5 | #4,508 | 6 | #6,626 |
| 1963 | 6 | #3,970 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 6 | #3,963 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,756 |
| 1960 | 13 | #2,404 | 8 | #5,098 |
| 1959 | 5 | #4,477 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 12 | #2,484 | 13 | #3,514 |
| 1957 | 6 | #3,919 | 11 | #3,884 |
| 1956 | 10 | #2,766 | 5 | #6,718 |
| 1955 | 11 | #2,534 | 11 | #3,746 |
| 1954 | 12 | #2,418 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 8 | #3,101 | 10 | #3,909 |
| 1952 | 10 | #2,651 | 11 | #3,516 |
| 1951 | 9 | #2,819 | 14 | #2,907 |
| 1950 | 12 | #2,304 | 14 | #2,884 |
| 1949 | 8 | #2,982 | 13 | #2,969 |
| 1948 | 13 | #2,202 | 17 | #2,475 |
| 1947 | 15 | #2,058 | 14 | #2,871 |
| 1946 | 13 | #2,126 | 12 | #3,003 |
| 1945 | 11 | #2,222 | 8 | #3,628 |
| 1944 | 11 | #2,285 | 12 | #2,746 |
| 1943 | 9 | #2,706 | 19 | #2,063 |
| 1942 | 12 | #2,243 | 19 | #2,031 |
| 1941 | 9 | #2,621 | 10 | #3,000 |
| 1940 | 7 | #3,087 | 12 | #2,551 |
| 1939 | 7 | #3,064 | 15 | #2,194 |
| 1938 | 13 | #2,074 | 17 | #2,009 |
| 1937 | 9 | #2,643 | 13 | #2,429 |
| 1936 | 8 | #2,814 | 18 | #1,865 |
| 1935 | 18 | #1,702 | 21 | #1,715 |
| 1934 | 11 | #2,372 | 32 | #1,286 |
| 1933 | 7 | #3,232 | 29 | #1,356 |
| 1932 | 21 | #1,577 | 18 | #1,938 |
| 1931 | 10 | #2,619 | 21 | #1,733 |
| 1930 | 16 | #1,947 | 21 | #1,804 |
| 1929 | 16 | #1,989 | 25 | #1,591 |
| 1928 | 19 | #1,815 | 34 | #1,336 |
| 1927 | 12 | #2,505 | 27 | #1,611 |
| 1926 | 8 | #3,332 | 34 | #1,384 |
| 1925 | 10 | #2,900 | 43 | #1,192 |
| 1924 | 13 | #2,450 | 37 | #1,348 |
| 1923 | 11 | #2,745 | 27 | #1,630 |
| 1922 | 12 | #2,609 | 29 | #1,570 |
| 1921 | 18 | #1,971 | 42 | #1,200 |
| 1920 | 20 | #1,809 | 42 | #1,186 |
| 1919 | 27 | #1,404 | 63 | #888 |
| 1918 | 13 | #2,372 | 40 | #1,202 |
| 1917 | 16 | #1,971 | 38 | #1,177 |
| 1916 | 16 | #1,928 | 33 | #1,272 |
| 1915 | 19 | #1,650 | 36 | #1,151 |
| 1914 | 16 | #1,595 | 53 | #801 |
| 1913 | 10 | #1,921 | 26 | #1,084 |
| 1912 | 10 | #1,723 | 31 | #917 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,288 |
| 1910 | 5 | #1,801 | 26 | #855 |
| 1909 | 7 | #1,253 | 28 | #772 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,126 |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,510 | 23 | #789 |
| 1906 | 7 | #1,098 | 21 | #815 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,052 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 21 | #802 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 21 | #755 |
| 1902 | 6 | #1,116 | 13 | #1,012 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 17 | #821 |
| 1900 | 10 | #894 | 27 | #700 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 14 | #903 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 18 | #813 |
| 1897 | 7 | #923 | 12 | #972 |
| 1896 | 5 | #1,238 | 20 | #726 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 25 | #619 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 16 | #777 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 16 | #762 |
| 1892 | 5 | #1,225 | 13 | #856 |
| 1891 | 5 | #1,100 | 23 | #555 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 13 | #787 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 14 | #716 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 17 | #629 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 14 | #628 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 15 | #601 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 10 | #733 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 7 | #809 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rossie reached #894 in 1900. As a girl name, it reached #555 in 1891. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rossie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.