Is Roxy a boy or girl name?
Roxy is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 50 girls and 0 boys were named Roxy, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 97.4% of the 3,898 US babies named Roxy were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,204
- Babies named Roxy since 1882
- 3,898
- Most popular year
- 2009
- 145 babies
Boys and girls named Roxy, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 64 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 83 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 39 | 100% |
| 1910s | 11 | 115 | 91.3% |
| 1920s | 9 | 133 | 93.7% |
| 1930s | 27 | 145 | 84.3% |
| 1940s | 35 | 313 | 89.9% |
| 1950s | 21 | 457 | 95.6% |
| 1960s | 0 | 230 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 97 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 134 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 134 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 745 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 834 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 272 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,204 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 56 | #3,007 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 55 | #3,022 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,664 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,384 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,212 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,860 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,897 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,897 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,310 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 99 | #2,007 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 93 | #2,079 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,729 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 94 | #2,066 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 121 | #1,734 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 145 | #1,560 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 135 | #1,661 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,921 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 80 | #2,369 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 84 | #2,200 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,642 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,514 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,275 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,807 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,458 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,160 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,922 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 13 | #7,190 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,684 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,545 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,995 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,774 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,664 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,312 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,774 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,782 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,013 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,855 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,859 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,587 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,917 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,735 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,463 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,209 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,920 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,571 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,473 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,597 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,927 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,337 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,730 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,257 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,422 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,081 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,928 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,954 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,245 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,511 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,693 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,486 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,916 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,150 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,912 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,722 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,009 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,976 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,487 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,577 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,532 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,311 |
| 1953 | 7 | #3,382 | 58 | #1,285 |
| 1952 | 5 | #4,172 | 48 | #1,414 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,448 |
| 1950 | 9 | #2,738 | 43 | #1,405 |
| 1949 | 6 | #3,635 | 44 | #1,404 |
| 1948 | 9 | #2,761 | 37 | #1,544 |
| 1947 | 5 | #4,178 | 52 | #1,267 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,528 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,574 |
| 1944 | 7 | #3,066 | 30 | #1,516 |
| 1943 | 8 | #2,931 | 36 | #1,392 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,795 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,514 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,088 |
| 1939 | 5 | #3,889 | 12 | #2,556 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,099 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,294 |
| 1936 | 8 | #2,816 | 18 | #1,866 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,085 |
| 1934 | 8 | #2,922 | 15 | #2,161 |
| 1933 | 6 | #3,576 | 9 | #3,075 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,624 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,406 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,292 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,559 |
| 1928 | 9 | #3,033 | 11 | #2,927 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,246 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,333 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,752 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,946 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,576 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,092 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,361 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,445 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,241 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,361 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,190 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,015 |
| 1915 | 5 | #4,297 | 14 | #2,238 |
| 1914 | 6 | #3,204 | 7 | #3,127 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,139 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,357 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,803 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,609 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,020 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,517 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,125 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,000 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,412 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,171 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,361 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,152 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,399 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,189 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,330 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,158 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,009 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 10 | #936 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,318 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,456 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 10 | #882 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 8 | #929 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,082 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 10 | #734 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,151 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 13 | #559 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 7 | #802 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Roxy reached #2,738 in 1950. As a girl name, it reached #559 in 1883. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Roxy
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.